| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled NY's Template Bill for American Covid Concentration Camps and Forcible Vaccination, Monitored Treatments, No Right to Contact Family/Lawyer, Indefinite detention of a person, contacts, groups, CatHerd wrote: |
Ah now I see where the confusion is. This is a second thread posted by ransomnote about the bill, this time with a correction indicating it has been stricken. Well done and thank you to ransomnote. Her first article from The Daily Expose did not indicate it was stricken, but rather claimed it is still up for a vote, as you can see: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4025760/posts I have got a number of pings about this from various threads, and, as I was replying from my pings page, did not notice this was a new thread she had posted, as the titles are similar. It would have helped if she had pinged me saying she had posted *another, corrected* thread (and would have been proper ettiquette, too, as I am mentioned in the text of this one), but I am not complaining will take responsibility for my error. The first posting from The Daily Expose was false and misleading. This one I have no problem with. I don’t share *all* her opinions, but she presents them as her opinions and she should be free to express them here, as we all are. I imagine we can all agree on what a nasty witch Hillary, though! |
*
Wrong. This is the first article about the bill I posted. Your tireless protection of those who are trying to force this kind of content into law continues.
I posted this and THEN I saw the Expose article and I realized I can't take your word for it, nor that of those saying 'it's been withdrawn!" that is has been withdrawn in any meaningful sense. It can be back on the table tomorrow.
The Daily Expose is likely more accurate in that the bill is still valid for consideration as soon as anyone decides to schedule it. I don't know, and I don't know how to find out. So both articles are up for consideration.
Have you no idea just how conspicuous you and others are being about this content? You are determined to create false impressions about this like careers are at stake.
This was posted on
12/31/2021, 8:45:58 PM · by ransomnote · 31 replies
The Daily Expose thread was posted at
Posted on 12/31/2021, 5:29:33 PM by ransomnote
Link: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4025760/posts
Yet you claim you posted this one first?
And how could you link to the other, older post in the OP of this one if this one was posted first? Hello?
I have “protected” no one. I’m glad that bill is dead. It stunk, bigly.
The Daily Expose piece was incorrect in that it stated the bill is still up for vote on Jan. 5. It is not. It was withdrawn by its sponsor and stricken on Dec. 22:
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/a416
By the way, the original text has *not* “been scrubbed from the internet” and you did not need the Wayback Machine. Here they are:
The most recent, A416 (scroll down for full text), also you can download PDF at link here:
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/a416
The original bill A6891 (2015):
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2015/A6891
Second intoduction, 680 (2017):
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2017/A680
Third introduction, A99 (2019)
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/A99
Yes, it could theoretically be reintroduced again, even though the sponsor said he will not do so (politicians lie, and he’s a dem). You can check on it by going to that same link. If re-introduced, it will show.
If you are concerned a different, but similar, bill might be put on the agenda, you can search here:
https://www.nysenate.gov/search/legislation
You are welcome.