We have an excellent idea what the long term effects are of mRNA. This is the problem. People don’t really understand the basic science. From people who call mRNA genes and genetic treatment to people who erroneously say it’s causing blood clots (actually is the JJ that is causing thrombosis which is the standard vaccination) to the misrepresentation of the self limited myocarditis risk it is typical behavior of liberal ideology. Argue the emotion and don’t look at the facts while trying to be right at all costs.
You are incorrect in much of what you said. These are the facts.
ransomnote: Sadly, available research going on since 2005 showed devastating problems the mRNA shots had with ADE and for this reason, this technology has never been released to the public prior to Covid. They never fixed the problem and simply started administering it. Artcore is correct - we have no idea what the long term effects of this concoction will be, despite your pontifications, but we can count on the ADE tragically surfacing as it always does.
gas_dr: People don’t really understand the basic science. From people who call mRNA genes and genetic treatment...
ransomnote: The SEC documents statements by the FDA which refer to the mRNA a gene therapy. The SEC doesn't say the mRNA DOESN'T permanently alter DNA, it says it's not DESIGNED to do so - BIG difference.
gas_dr: ....to people who erroneously say it’s causing blood clots (actually is the JJ that is causing thrombosis which is the standard vaccination)
ransomnote: That's not true. Did you just make that up? A real doctor would know that's not true.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
The list of medical symptoms which include 'thrombosis' was so big I put it at the end of an old thread elsewhere.
List of search terms which include 'thrombosis' at the bottom of this post.
gas_dr: You are incorrect in much of what you said. These are the facts.
ransomnote: Unbelievable. You were factually wrong on all points and simply stated the opposite as if HE was the one making up self-serving content.
No you don't, liar. Where did you get that 'idea'?
I prefer to deal with facts and science over 'ideas' pulled out of someone's anal orifice. Thanks anyway.
And what's with this 'we' business? Do you claim to speak for all doctors and even actual experts in the field everywhere? Please get over yourself, gassie.