Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
IMHO, it has to do with the existence of a steady food supply, population explosion, and a quite understandable narrowing of genetic variation in later populations. Obviously the largest families tend to have the most descendants. Standing armies were among the consequences of the agricultural revolution(s), and neighboring groups would lose females to the more prosperous settled groups, particularly if they tried a raid against a settlement with a standing army. Harem-style partnerships are very very old, after all. Thanks SteveH.

6 posted on 12/20/2021 3:24:23 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

So why am I thinking that propinquity also plays here?

Something like “While the hunter is away, the farmer comes in to play!”


64 posted on 12/20/2021 5:11:24 PM PST by SES1066 (Ask not what the LEFT can do for you, rather ask what the LEFT is doing to YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson