Posted on 12/20/2021 11:46:25 AM PST by ransomnote
[H/T AMorePerfectUnion]
The latest filings by Special Counsel John Durham reveal that lawyers for the Hillary Clinton Campaign now represent Christopher Steele primary subsource Igor Danchenko. In doing so, Durham reveals something else: that the Hillary Clinton Campaign and multiple former employees of the Hillary Clinton Campaign are under investigation.
Let’s walk through the latest developments.Background
Igor Danchenko, the primary subsource of Christopher Steele, was arrested on November 3, 2021 for giving multiple false statements to federal officials during his 2017 interviews with the FBI. These included lies about Danchenko’s sources, his travels to Russia, and his falsified contacts with Sergei Millian. We laid out Danchenko’s indictment here.
Notably, Special Counsel John Durham alleges that one of Danchenko’s real “sources” was Charles Dolan, Jr. (perhaps first identified by Aaron Mate), who served in various leadership positions to elect Bill Clinton in the 1992 and 1996 campaigns and was an advisor to Hillary Clinton in her 2016 campaign for president. With Dolan’s involvement, the obvious question becomes whether he was the intermediary between the Clinton Campaign and Danchenko.
The Involvement of the Hillary Clinton Campaign
After all, we know that the Hillary Clinton Campaign paid for the Steele dossiers and the work by Fusion GPS. This was arranged through their attorneys (and the DNC attorneys) at Perkins Coie - notably Mark Elias and Michael Sussmann. Elias left the firm this summer. Sussmann was indicted in September 2021 by Special Counsel Durham for giving false statements relating to the Alfa Bank/Trump hoax.
It is highly likely that the Clinton Campaign was receiving updates on the Fusion GPS/Christopher Steele work once they were hired by Perkins Coie in the spring of 2016. This is work the client - the Clinton Campaign - paid for. (The sharing of this info would be consistent with the Clinton Campaign - notably Jake Sullivan - receiving backchannel updates on the Alfa Bank hoax.)
If the Clinton Campaign was being informed of the work by Fusion GPS, what of the likelihood that the Clinton Campaign was informing the work of Fusion GPS? It was Clintons’ idea to link Trump and Russia in the first place. And associates of the Clinton Campaign (Sidney Blumenthal) were working to corroborate parts of the dossier.
With that in mind, I leave you this bit of information provided by the New York Times in September (emphasis added) suggesting the complicity of the Clinton Campaign:
Some of the questions that Mr. Durham’s team has been asking in recent months — including of witnesses it subpoenaed before a grand jury, according to people familiar with some of the sessions — suggest he has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and Mr. Trump in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign.
The Latest Developments
Now let’s review what’s going on in Danchenko’s criminal case. He was originally represented by Chris Schafbuch and Mark Schamel. On December 6, 2021, Stuart Sears appeared on behalf of Danchenko. Schafbuch and Schamel dropped out of the case.
According to Durham’s latest filing, Stuart Sears is a partner at the law firm Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears. Notably, the firm is currently representing the 2016 “Hillary for America” presidential campaign (the “Clinton Campaign”), as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the Special Counsel.”
Nothing is going to happen here. Durham is deep state and DOJ is about anything but the rule of law. I’ll believe Durham actually doing something when I see it.
Put on hold, or labeled as “dirty tricks against a political opponent”.
I think she is running to imply that any prosecution against her is just Republicans who skeerd she’ll win EVEN MORE VOTES THAN BRANDON!
“ I’ll believe Durham actually doing something when I see it.”
No you won’t.
He’s doing something right now and you don’t see it.
You members of the Eeyore club do nothing but whine and complain, and your post here proves that. Durham is rolling up the entire thing and here you are like a 5 year old in the back seat asking if we are there yet. These things take time, and now that it’s finally happening, the Eeyore club still isn’t happy.
Tick tock!
Probably after the FDA Pfizer documents in 2075.
The "5 year old" that started asking the question is now 10 years old. It's been that long.
US Marshall is providing security
The “5 year old” that started asking the question is now 10 years old. It’s been that long.
> Durham was appointed when?
It seems like Durham is just the latest face of the long stall.
Clinton knows the game of having your attorney “represent” all the defendants in your circle of corruption. You get to control the strategy, know all the parts, and stop any deals to squeal. Beth Wilkinson was lawyer for a herd of Clintonians during the illegal server whitewash, though of course she truly represented only Hillary’s interests.
—> You members of the Eeyore club do nothing but whine and complain, and your post here proves that.
+1
“With that in mind, I leave you this bit of information provided by the New York Times in September (emphasis added) suggesting the complicity of the Clinton Campaign:
Some of the questions that Mr. Durham’s team has been asking in recent months — including of witnesses it subpoenaed before a grand jury, according to people familiar with some of the sessions — suggest he has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and Mr. Trump in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign.“
————————————————————-
Isn’t this a fact?
There will be no report. Only indictments. 3 so far, a flood of them in the near future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.