To: sima_yi
Maybe this will help?
:::::::::::::::::::::::
That doesn’t make your case at all. You’re either just not that bright or you are a troll which I suspect. Sorry to use such forceful language but we are in trying times. And your initial comment was a lie and you still can’t back it up because it was a lie. You said the vaccine was never intended to prevent covid. That was never said until long after the vaccine was introduced and they realized it was not preventing or stopping the spread of covid. There should be ample evidence before the vaccine was even introduced of somebody saying what you allege they said. But there isn’t so you made it up. Like a troll would.
22 posted on
12/15/2021 10:33:45 AM PST by
bramps
(t's the Islam, stupid!I )
To: bramps
Let's try one more time.
They (Trump administration health officials and the CDC) did not say the vaccine would prevent transmission of the virus (SARS Corona Virus 2). I can't prove they didn't say it, because that would require proving a negative, which, as you should know, is impossible.
You are not happy with that.
They did not say the vaccine would NOT prevent the transmission of the virus. I can't prove they didn't say it, because that would require proving a negative, which, as you should know, is impossible.
You are not happy with that.
From these two non-statements, I infer that the vaccine has no effect on transmission, one way or another. This is a reasonable assumption.
You are not happy with that.
I pointed out an interview on CNN with Wolf Blitzer, where the head of the CDC unequivocally stated that the vaccine does not prevent transmission of the virus.
You are not happy with that.
Because I have neither the time nor the inclination to do other people's research for them, you level an ad hominem attack.
I am done.
23 posted on
01/01/2022 10:31:57 AM PST by
sima_yi
( Reporting live from the far North)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson