“China through 23 months — ( 4,849 deaths since beginning of pandemic / 1,439,323,776 Chinese citizens ) x 100 = 0.0033 %
Source: Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center
Looking forward to your explanation.”
HAHAHAHA! R U freaking serious!? CNN must be your truth source as well! LOL!
If no data, data source of collection methodology is reliable, then all the discussion is moot.
Those advocating for the mRNA injections cite occasional sources, but mostly make assertions without sources. Or fall back to CDC pronouncements.
I am indeed “freaking serious” that the data sources throughout this “pandemic” are constructions, fabrications, forecasts which cannot be proven and blind assertions. That is the point.
The “pandemic” advocates from the start began with “bogus” and continue with “bogus” dressed up beautifully as “science.” And we here Fauci himself say he represents “science.” He represents bureaucracy and profit-harvesting pharmaceuticals. The point of the sentence you excerpted stands. If someone "believes" the JHU data in part, then they must believe it in the whole. Ditto with all the supposedly statistical data sources which one may want to cite. My observation is that the whole darn thing is bogus, there has been a "pandemic" which required the redefinition of pandemic in order to push "vaccines" by redefining vaccines and :boosters" as boosters. The con unravels. My reccomendation to you is to re-read the entire thread, and perhaps you will conclude something other than you have.