[Farcesensitive]

“In general” is the important part of that statement on fingers.

Too many people take something like that and treat it as a 100% law of nature.

But if you see someone with too many exceptions then you can suspect a trannie.

[smileyface]

https://www.eutimes.net/2021/12/leaked-doc-reveals-whatsapp-and-imessage-send-everyones-private-conversations-to-the-fbi-non-stop/

See ‘leaked’ graphic.

‘Every 15 minutes.’

[little jeremiah]

Transpervs are easy to spot. No need to look at ring finger length.

This “in general” ring finger length things seems to have turned into “any woman with long ring finger is a man” and it’s beyond stupid.

[17strings]

But if you see someone with too many exceptions then you can suspect a trannie.

---

Just how many of these “exceptions” are too many? (How many of them ARE there, for that matter?) Do each of them have equal import? If not, then which ones carry the most weight, and why? Is each exception assigned a numerical value, so that one can calculate a person’s Trannie Suspect Score? By what criteria does a person under examination pass or fail?

Inquiring minds want to know.