Unless I missed it, I didn’t see how far along she was.
If she was 8 months along, I have difficulty visualizing how someone could shoot her, although having a gun pointed at you would likely have a bearing on it.
But if she was two or three months along, she might not show.
I get the distinct impression the media source included that to make it more salacious or damning.
So, would you allow a woman 7-8 months pregnant to shot you just because she is pregnant? Lost in all of this are charges she would face for purposefully hitting a motorcycle. She could have killed the man on the bike, yet we are to give her a pass because she is pregnant? Could he have followed her home and wait down the road, maybe. They already called the cops and were waiting. Once she came out of the house with a gun, she escalated the situation not the biker. You are correct about the click bait title of the article.