The data itself shows it isn't true. The vaccinated group would be weighted more heavily toward the older side of the 10-59 age range. The unvaccinated group would be weighted heavier to the lower end of the 10-59 age range. Do you really not get the difference, and how in using them together as though that is a valid comparison is a bogus narrative? Do you really not?
Stop this nonsense already.
Clever use of the Subjunctive Mood there, Republican Wildcat!
Two can play at that game:
The vaxxed group might be two or three years older than the unvaxxed group. Their median age might be, say, 39 years - as opposed to, say, 37 years for the unvaxxed group.
Do you honestly think that an age-difference of a mere two or three years justifies a doubling of the mortality rate?
Regards,
The UK Office of National Statistics put the data out with the funky 10-59 age range group. I find it strange considering they broke out the 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ as different groups. It makes for a convenient reason for the disparity between the vaccination groups but it is strange and can also be hiding other issues.