You're the one who brought up footnote 9. You said "Berenson omitted or ignored the footnote in this study that explicitly explains why the numbers look the way they do:"
You said the footnote "explicitly explains why the numbers look the way they do." Can you elaborate on that, because it's not "explicitly" clear to me?
I'm not making the claim that the vaccines are increasing the mortality. I'm asking whether the decrease in mortality from the unvaccinated group should match the increase in mortality in the vaccinated group as the "older people" in footnote 9 move out of the unvaccinated group and into the vaccinated group?
That's a simple question that you won't answer.
The 5-year population bands are roughly equal, based on 2011 data, with the 55-59 band actually the smallest of the 10-59 band. And yet, the footnote is attributing this group as the cause for the mortality increase (and probably the 50-54 band, too).
According to the data, from March 19 to May 19 about 11.5 million people moved from the unvaccinated group to the vaccinated group. The chart shows that during this period, the death rate tripled for the vaccinated group, but only halved for the unvaccinated group.
I'm asking you the simple question: should we have expected the rise in one group to match the decrease in the other group? If not, since this is "explicitly explained" to you, can you explain the mismatch in rates to me?
Once we can settle on that observation, we can then discuss any further implications.
-PJ
Bullshit. I've concluded there's no evidence of a higher all-cause mortality rate in the 10-59 age group in the UK.
You said the footnote "explicitly explains why the numbers look the way they do." Can you elaborate on that, because it's not "explicitly" clear to me?
Your problem.
It's high school level logic which has been explained to you several times.
And yet, the footnote is attributing this group as the cause for the mortality increase (and probably the 50-54 band, too).
Ah, assuming good faith on your part I see you don't understand the footnote.
Well, I can't explain it any more simply than I already have so we should probably both move on to another thread.