But is it fraud if one chooses to be vaccinated with something experimental? Let the buyer beware.
The sleight of hand we've seen with the FDA approving Pfizer's jab, then announcement of mandates that leverage that approval, then weeks later comes the realization that no approved drug has actually been distributed, so as to allow other Big Pharma producers to jab with their still-EUA drugs, should make clear that informed consent has been violated. Pfizer's wanting a court to let them hide the experimental data for 55 years is another blow to informed consent. The jab's "recipe" changing for various age groups relies on continuation of EUA, as do boosters, which don't have the same level of scrutiny as the jabs should further tell us that neither Big Pharma or our medical "watchdogs" (if they even exist) are doing a horrible job at keeping the public informed.
They elites must believe not in US laws, but that they still may wield the divine right of kings over us serfs.
We don't have informed consent. Instead, the propaganda emanating from the paid-off corporate medical moguls overwhelms us from every angle (as below).
It’s no different than if I sold you a “perfectly good car” with the transmission stuffed with sawdust…