Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Notthemomma; Stingray51
Notthemomma, I neglected to reply to you with this:
This is an article in the Tampa Bay Times written by By Samantha Putterman.

There’s still no evidence the FBI incited the Jan. 6 riot, despite claims otherwise

It asks the question of the Revolver News article, “BOMBSHELL: Did Jan. 6 Riot and Ray Epps EXPOSE a Corrupt FBI?”

And gives this Short answer: No.

Yet it also provides facts that indicate
the Long Answer: Yes!

After Jan. 6, videos emerged showing some of Epps’ actions in Washington. During an Oct. 21 House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing of the Department of Justice, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., showed clips of Epps repeatedly encouraging protesters on the streets of Washington to “go into the Capitol.” Among the scenes he showed at the 5:03:00 minute mark of the hearing:

Massie suggested that Epps may work for the FBI and he asked Attorney General Merrick Garland whether the government sent agents to “agitate” protesters into entering the Capitol. Garland responded that the Justice Department doesn’t comment on pending investigations.

The article goes on:
Epps’ image was at one point included on the FBI Capitol Violence most wanted list, a website that seeks the public’s help in identifying people involved in the riot. Because the FBI removed the image from the website sometime in July, Revolver claims this indicates that the government is attempting to erase Epps’ name from the riot.

“Ray Epps is a free man. He has never been arrested or charged,” the Revolver story also states. “Nearly 10 months after January 6, the FBI and Justice Department still refuse to comment on whether Epps has ever been served a search warrant.”


32 posted on 11/21/2021 3:12:21 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister

Thanks for the responses, everyone. I had heard some of that or read some of that elsewhere, but in the same way I’m a fan of Star Trek and Star Wars but am NOT a fanatic, trekkie, cosplayer, obsessed groupie with no life, etc., I am not fixated on Jan 6, conspiracies, etc. I have never heard a Rogan podcast, regardless of how popular he is, in fact I’m not a podcast fan at all, of anything/anyone. And it’s dangerous for anyone to trust google results—they’re filtered by google and influenced by groups that post false information in large numbers to get their false results up to the top of a search. But even the MSM throws in short identifiers when they mention names, at least the first time, or throw in a phrase that lets you know what the overall topic is about, even if sometimes misleading or false: “...disgraced ex-CBS CEO Joe Blow...” or “....the debunked claim that the FBI planted the diaries....” etc. are just some examples. I won’t apologize for expecting some basic info on posts that tell me whether it’s worth my time to follow their links or their logic. After all, if I’m expected already to know all about the subject matter, why even post the threads in the first place, unless the reason to give important updates or to teach the unwashed masses the basics? But there’s only so much time in a day, and, yes, it’s easier to type out a question than to google and wade through cyber-mud.


42 posted on 12/04/2021 8:33:06 AM PST by Notthemomma ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson