The term "equity" has never been properly defined by the politicos who bandy it about as though it had been mentioned in the Constitution, and debated by constitutional experts since the beginning of time.
Does she mean that the verdict should have been more racially equitable? If so: How? The defendant and all the alleged "victims" were White.
Does she mean that it should have been more "equitable" with regards to "gender-identity?!"
Great minds want to know...
Regards,
<><>Does Harris mean that the Kenosha verdict should have been more racially equitable?
<><>If so: How? The defendant and all the alleged “victims” were White.
<><>Does she mean that it should have been more “equitable” with regards to “gender-identity?!”
With any luck, we won’t get to hear the dork elaborate.
She’s a know-nothing knee jerk lefty.
Does she mean that it should have been more "equitable" with regards to "gender-identity?!"
Great minds want to know...
I know you're just joking around but I'll still answer your questions.
Specifically regarding the Rittenhouse case, Laughing Kamala means that the U.S. justice system failed to unjustifiably punish President Trump or any of his 75 Million+ supporters (which includes Kyle Rittenhouse). Laughing Kamala doesn't like that.
As I often say, the Democrat Party Cabal (DPC) will continue maniacally bashing Trump (and his 75 Million+ voters) on a 24/7/365 basis through 2024 ... as it has relentlessly done since the 2020 Presidential "election." The DPC's (and Kamala's) constant message to America is: If you supported or voted for Donald Trump either in 2016 or 2020, you are a guilty, evil, hateful, despicable, racist, homophobic, sexist xenophobe.
In closing, I hope the "Great minds" you mentioned appreciate my indisputable answer.