I remember that link. I might even have posted it at some point back when I was excited about IVM. But none of those studies involve testing against Delta and an in-depth analysis of those studies showed fraud. Even Dr. Kory’s own “study”, since pulled by the publisher, is alleged to have been fabricated, as the hospital says testing never happened.
with an avg 14-day resolve of mild symptoms/infectivity for youngsters, 67% ‘improvement’ ‘for early treatment’ doesn’t sound very good when you think about it. By 14 days doing nothing at all most people will be at 100% ‘improvement’. So it’s still not as good as monoclonals.
Kory got caught in a trap of his own making and now has to admit ivermectin is not effective against Delta (but maybe, he says, if you take twice as much, it might be!).
You’re better off trusting your life to monoclonals.
Regarding MABs vs. Ivermectin, I don’t see this as an either/or proposition. This has put us in the situation we are in, depending on vaccines that aren’t vaccines and have been greatly oversold.
Regarding “an in-depth analysis of those studies showed fraud”, link? I know one study was removed because of fraud. Anti-Ivermectin folks (corporate media, paid for by Big Pharma) used this to try to discredit Ivermectin, ignoring all the non-discredited studies. I am suspicious when this sort of thinking is pushed.
I notice that nothing you say is actually true.
You are falsely claiming all the ivermectin studies are fraudulent.
That is spectacularly dishonest.
There are 25 studies reporting a positive effect from early treatment with ivermectin. The meta analysis concludes a typical 67% improvement in outcome.
So you lied about all 25 of these studies being fraudulent. Falsely claiming that there is no scientific support for ivermectin.
But you also lied about a 67% improvement being worse than doing nothing. The meta analysis page i linked clearly shows that this improvement is relative to doing nothing (the control group). So you claim ivermectin is 33% worse than doing nothing, but reality is it is 67% better than doing nothing.
So what are you doing by lying to people about the relevant science? Getting people killed?
You falsely talk about monoclonal antibodies as if one must choose to do ivermectin or monoclonal, but not both.
There is no reason you can’t do both.
There is no contraindication.
Our bodies - our choice.
“an in-depth analysis of those studies showed fraud”.
What crap.
Yet more claptrap from you now on “Delta”? You have that a-backwards too. Ivermectin is a more broadly effective anti-viral but the jabs are ultimately “anti-effective” against “Delta”.
Take a look at the situation in Gibraltar. Or Israel. Or the UK. Or...
Go live in fear if you want. Quit trying to infect others with your amateur virologist opinions.
I’m proof that ivermectin works to alleviate symptoms and help bounce back quickly from the Wuhan Red Death.