Interdasting. I will check into it. Thank you.
MIND BLOWER !!!
Analysis: 100% of Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots are From Only 5% of the Manufacturer Lots According to VAERS
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
The EXPOSÉ out of the UK published an analysis yesterday that they conducted in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) looking at batch numbers of COVID-19 FDA authorized vaccines, which discovered the shocking result that 100% of the deaths reported following these shots came from only 5% of the batches, and we are talking about several thousand batches.
They used a batch number analysis from the influenza vaccines for a “control dataset” to determine what is typical of percentage of adverse reactions spread across all batches.
Not only was this analysis shocking in finding that total deaths were concentrated in only 5% of the batches manufactured, they also found that the data showed that this 5% of total batches produced were also the more widely distributed batches to all 50 states.
This raises many ethical and potentially criminal questions. Are we just dealing with quality control issues here, or something more evil by these pharmaceutical companies, most of which have long rap sheets of criminal activities in their past, particularly Pfizer?
We do know, for example, that certain documents that Pfizer supplied to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for their COVID-19 shots showed that in some of the test batches they only had 55% of the mRNA intact. (Source.)
The EMA allegedly approved the shots anyway because “the amounts of a potential protein produced by the truncated mRNA would be too low to constitute a safety risk.” (Source.)
That should equate to fewer, not more, adverse reactions like deaths recorded in VAERS.
This would mean that the greater percentage of batches produced, but also the fewest distributed and with the fewest amounts of adverse reactions, are the faulty ones not produced properly, while the 5% of the ones causing the most harm and distributed the most are doing exactly what they were manufactured to do.
...
But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.
Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?
Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
Dr Mike Yeadon – “The findings that 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths have been caused by just 5% of the batches produced are unprecedented”
This information about different safety profiles of different “lots” (batches of finished product of covid19 vaccines) is completely without precedent.
I’m thinking about it and I don’t yet have clear in my mind what the envelope of plausible / possible explanations are.
But the bottom line is that the majority of lots were associated with good short term safety, few hospitalisations & deaths, which is true for both the Pfizer & Moderna injections.
But in both cases, a small number of vaccine lots are associated with incredibly high rates of adverse events including deaths.
How can this possibly happen? Drug manufacturing is performed to exacting standards of control. The ‘active’ agent is made in batches. It cannot be guessed how many doses each batch makes, because no one has ever made commercial scale mRNA products before.
But each batch of what’s called “drug substance” is then used to formulate, fill, pack & label various lots of finished drug product.
Testing methods are developed for all of the manufacturing steps, together with standards for the results to be considered acceptable.
Something happened between drug substance & drug product which resulted in a small number of finished lots for distribution which were destined to kill huge numbers of people.
Possible explanations (not exhaustive):
1. Errors made in the final steps of manufacturing which resulted in certain batches bring reasonably benign & others extraordinarily deadly. I just cannot imagine the kind of mistakes which could produce such radically different clinical profiles. For example, poor handling during shipping & storage prior to administration to people. Problem I have with this is that such handling errors (eg allowing temperate to rise way above limits defined in stability testing) usually result in drug product which doesn’t work properly, as it’s degraded, not in drug product that’s incredible dangerous.
2. At some point in manufacturing, someone or some entity actively modified what was being filled into vials, and it was this which resulted in extreme skew of clinical safety profile.
There has been so much truly awful behaviour of “elites” that I’m simply not willing (as I would have historically) to dismiss the possibility that this has been done on purpose.
What I do know, and this is a test of whether there’s the slightest sign of integrity from these companies as well as the regulatory agencies, is that all use of the affected produce must immediately cease, all batches of drug substance & lots of drug product should cease.
The materials should be recalled to a place of stable storage & an intense analytical investigation initiated.
Unless factors are found which adequately explain the huge differences in clinical adverse event profiles, administration to humans must not restart.
If the manufacturers do not exhibit sufficient control of drug product, the authorisation they hold from various regulatory authorities are utterly voided.
Just when you thought this debacle couldn’t possibly get any worse, it gets much worse.
Expect to hear more about this.
Meanwhile, who in their right mind would roll up their sleeve?