And lack of any evidence doesn't stop you from stumbling to that conclusion. The same sort of idiotic reasoning I've come to expect from you.
Well firstly it's not a conclusion, and secondly there is evidence to support the theory that this may have been a Union member's effort to f*** with non union members being used on the set.
The same sort of idiotic reasoning I've come to expect from you.
If you can't follow the reasoning, it must certainly appear to be "magic" to you.