[wardaddy]

To clarify for Freepers who hate anything past a headline glance

This is a statement written by and submitted by her attorneys

[William Tell]

From the lawyers for the armorer: "Ultimately this set would never have been compromised if live ammo were not introduced."

I'm pretty sure that procedures can be implemented such that having live ammo present will not result in deaths. Is it the armorers claim that the procedures in place were inadequate to detect the presence of live ammo? That seems to be what is implied here. I think she needs better lawyers.