Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Avalon Memories
The Reuters headline makes it clear that the round was live.

Yes, obviously the round that was fired was live. But was the intent to load dummy rounds, or was the intent to load blanks?

Each has a different safety and handling procedure.

47 posted on 10/27/2021 12:00:37 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Fido969
This clears up one question:

After it was fired, Halls picked up the gun from a pew in the church set and took it to the armorer. Gutierrez Reed was told to open the gun so he could see what was inside. Halls said there were five rounds in the gun, at least four of which had"dummy" casings, as indicated by a hole on the side. There was one without the hole. He advised this round did not have the "cap" on it and was just the casing. David advised the incident was not a deliberate act, according to the affidavit.

Gutierrez Reed, meanwhile, said she checked the "dummies" and ensured they were not "hot rounds" prior to the cast and crew breaking for lunch.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/alec-baldwin-assistant-director-rust-safety-lapse

So, the intent was to use dummy rounds, not blanks. Dummy rounds are what is used when the gun is pointed at the camera. If blanks are used, there are specific protocols - not pointing at people within a certain distance, shields around crew and equipment.

Those are not required when dummy rounds are used.

57 posted on 10/27/2021 12:18:32 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson