Case 1:21-cr-00582-CRC Document 19 Filed 10/20/21 Page 1 of 17
Also
"Follow the pen"... The pen is missing.
#Durham With Sussmann hearing this week, worth revisiting latest filing that BEGINS to make clear how deep Durham goes: 15 separate grand jury subpoenas + 18 USC 1001 (lying) the “materiality test” is “capacity to influence” decision-maker (FBI) “Not actual reliance” + pic.twitter.com/BRKgAgwQZS— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 26, 2021
-------
broad production of information by the defendant’s counsel (i.e.,a privilege log) first alerted government to critical campaign emails. #footnotes via @RobLegare https://t.co/KXyhjtDKMj— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 26, 2021
GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS
"The United States of America, by and through its attorney, Special Counsel John H. Durham, respectfully submits this opposition to the defendant’s Motion for a Bill of Particulars (Document 17, hereinafter “Mot.”). For reasons stated below, the government submits that the motion should be denied. The grand jury’s detailed, 27-page speaking indictment more than adequately informs the defendant of the charges against him and provides him with sufficient information and facts to prepare his defense at trial. Moreover, all or nearly all of the information that the defendant seeks either has already been, or soon will be, made available to him through the government’s discovery. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion seeking an order for a bill of particulars fails as a matter of well-settled law."
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
"The defendant is charged in a one-count indictment with making a materially false statement to an FBI official, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001."
A.
-------
17 pages here.