You're the one who originally complained about women's health issues getting more tax dollars than comparable men's health issues.
I just pointed out that women's activism and men's lack of activism is why.
Not sure how anyone on this forum can’t understand that. Gov’t is the problem NOT the solution. Advocating men give more money to gov’t so that the gov’t spends more of taxpayer money for men is just asinine.
I never said anything about giving the government money. I said use activism to get more of it.
But that doesn't change my main point anyway. If men really care about whether they or their sons get prostate cancer, then take those billions they have spend on prostitution and donate it to research. They can do that without going through the government. In fact it would be tax deductible.
Of course, if men care more about the services from prostitutes than they do about saving their own lives or the lives of their sons from prostate cancer, then that's their choice.
I never said anything about giving the government money. I said use activism to get more of it. You really don't have much logic do you?
Also you are playing identity politics. That is something from the left. Another thing that doesn’t belong here. I used it to illustrate the absurdity of identity politics and why gov’t needs to be small and out of our lives.
But you embrace it and attack men and advocate spending more money on causes to get gov’t to spend more money on things you think our righteous.
You really don’t fit in here if that’s what you believe.