1. The cinematographer and director were shot, not cast members. It’s clear he’s breaking the first and second rules of gun handling.
2. The prop master should check and hand over the gun only at the beginning of a scene - he had the gun for other purposes.
3. He shot two people, not one.
4. He’s an idiot.
∴ He shot them purposefully
They could have been filming a scene panning down the barrel of the gun. The bullet passes through the camera person and hits the director in the shoulder.
Agreed. Maybe upset that she went for the director instead of his disgusting carcass?