That's ridiculous. He told me to 'splain' and posted a CDC propaganda piece. But at least you are publicly acknowledging your assertion that doubting the CDC is a 'conspiracy'.
But in her list of numerous so called data citations, she includes her own vanities, and the vanities of others. As I pointed out in the post that drew this vanity (which means I am directly over the target as it appears I am living rent free in a certain head), I cite the dirty dozen. She cites the exact same dirty dozen. There is nothing new in this rambling vanity except penumbras and shadows.
You are still changing the subject, attacking the messenger and ignoring the data. Why don't you win 1 million dollars by refuting Steve Kirsch instead? That would be, you know, refuting facts with facts of your own, instead of just knee jerk attacking me.
1. Vaccines doses have been administered in the hundreds of millions world wide. The only answer those against the vaccine for COvID has is that some day everyone vaccinated will drop dead.
Well, you're lying. I've been posting vaccine adverse events including death, strokes, heart attacks, paralysis, neurological damage, blood clots etc. as have doctors treating their patients. Dr. Hoffe documented harm to his 900 vaccinated patients and then published his work giving the newly vaccinated D-dimer tests to demonstrate microclots. Many doctors are providing data about vaccine harm and you lie and say there's just some hazy prediction everyone will 'drop dead.'
You keep sayin hundreds of millions of doses have been administered world wide like that's proof they work or are safe? They don't work and they are not safe.
The latest is the insane theory that vaccination causes AIDS. However, it does not, there is no plethora of new septicemias or unexplained and opportunistic infections. With the numbers they quote, by now opportunistic infections should be rife in all ICUs world wide — they are not. What they fail to understand is that AIDS was identified with the new surge of things like Kaposis Sarcoma and PCP PNA — we are not seeing this by any stretch. So it is diversion and fallacy
Have you refuted Steve Kirsch's data yet? How about Zelenko's What about the valid statistics on vaccine harm, vaccine failure etc. Why are you changing the subject to AIDS when you have never attempted to refute Kirsch, Zelenko, McCullough, Corey, etc.
2. They never speak to the fact that if we accept the 99.8% survivable rate, that this really means is that there is a 1/500 mortality rate — would they get on an airplane with those odds? However even using the most inflated numbers they quote as per percentage of dosages administered — it is infinitesimal as compared to the vaccine injuries (again, even the number they like to trumpet)
The numbers are closer to 99.7% and these are comparable to other illnesses. Those who are fragile enough to be high risk need not have been killed as they were by being denied all medications. Dr McCullough and Zelenko have been able to treat high risk patients and have an 85% reduction in hospitalization and death. You and your kind keep quoting the death levels the CDC was able to produce by refusing to treat people until they were too sick to recover and then puttin gthose on Remdesivir and ventilators. The 'death rate' for what is called Covid would be far less if we, you know, treated sick people.
3. The fact to the matter is that Breitbart reports that the spikes are in the most unvaccinated areas. Most of my colleagues and myself have not seen any critically ill in the vaccinated.
You and your fake medical colleagues all live in magical hospitals which have results opposite the real world. You're not going to admit what that is, but I know.
4. They simply fail to understand the fundamental logic question they want is to blow by — which is that correlation and causation are two different things. Best example of the day is that Colin Powell died of CoVID and was fully vaccinated. What they fail to mention or intentionally sweep under the rug is that Powell also had multiple myeloma, a hematological CA that reduces immune response.
Oh. Oh! TAKE STEVE KIRSCH UP THAT DEBATE POINT!!!! Correlation versus causation! Debate him and win 1 million dollars! I want you to debate Kirsch because you're lying and distorting the truth and if you try to debate your way out of it, you'll lose! That's why the CDC/NIH/Fauci/FDA won't debate anyone on the data. There's data that holds up to standard statistical analysis to prove you wrong. DEBATE KIRSCH! Stop changing the subject and whining - debate Kirsch.
5. I would love to see any one of the coterie of acolytes for these posters actually demonstrate their clinical experience, their medical training or their basic understanding of biology.
What has Fauci's medical degree done for us? How about Birx? The whole slew of doctors abusing the public trust. You mean if I catch them lying I can't say so unless I have 'clinical experience'? Youre a FAKE DOCTOR saying I have to demonstrate my medical training etc.?
Look what you do to those with impeccable credentials? Those who win nobel prizes for treatments, technologies, those who were the treating physician of Presidents, those who spoke before state and federal Senate(s), those who worked for Pfizer for decades and know what they are talking about - until they don't agree with your talking points, at which time, you smear them as 'the dirty dozen'. You're the one trashing credentials, until you demand them.
They are only able to cut and paste from their favorites (The cardiologist turned epidemiologist, the alien believing FP, and the one who charges $750 to hear her opinions) — but if you question the sources, it is tantamount to blasephmy — but as the saying goes — if you dont know what you stand for, you will fall for everything. The lack of basic understanding of elementary biological principles shine through glaringly in the posts of those who will believe clinically impossible things, but post them anyway.
Where's your information to contradict Kirsch, Zelenko, McCullough. Why do you have to resort to complaints about cut-paste or smear people. C'mon, is ad hominem all you have (YES!). You don't have data to prove your points -you have attacks on those whose data you can't refute.
6. What is most perplexing to me is the insistence of a decade of evidence. We used to be Americans who believed in American ingenuity. We put men and women in space and on the moon in response to challenges. We created the trinity test at the Manhattan Project in a compressed time frame in response to a grave threat. However, this group insists that Americans should be tethered to an artificial timeline to satisfy their fears. Every post is made stating the vaccinated will get their comeuppance quite soon. And yet it does not happen.
Aw. How pathetic of you. You're pretending that no one is being censored, that everyone has free choice, that there are no mandates, that no one is dying and there are no adverse events. You're pretending that the technology being forced upon us hasn't failed for 16 years straight. You're pretending you're not slave to Wuhan Fauci's dictats. You're pretending that the death rate is similar to Ebola and anyone not wishing to lose their job because they won't have an experimental gene therapy injection that doesn't work is just not an innovative American. You're pretending FAUCI hasn't been caught lying over and over again, and pretending the CDC is trustworthy.
More deaths from vaccinations than from Covid-19 in Taiwan
FreeWestMedia ^ | October 17, 2021 | Staff
Infection Rate in Vaccinated People in Their 40s Now More Than DOUBLE the Rate in Unvaccinated, PHE Data Shows, as Vaccine Effectiveness Hits Minus-109%
Daily Sceptic ^ | 15 October 2021
Fauci, HHS Officials Discuss Using New Virus From China To Enforce Universal Vaccines In Footage From Oct. 2019 (6 minute video)
.oann.com ^ | October 8, 2021 | OAN Newsroom
Latest UKHSA report shows Vaccinated accounted for 80% of Covid-19 Deaths and 60% of Hospitalisations in the last 4 weeks
theexpose.uk ^ | 10/16/2021 | The Expose
Please explain why the vaccines aren't working or refute Steve Kirsch or Zelenko's Covid report. DO SOMETHING with data to prove yourself - don't keep cutting and pasting attacks on people and just making trash up.
7. And when all else fails, they try to assign beliefs to us that are untrue. I am not a proponent for mandate — I find them repulsive. I believe people should have the right to choose or not to choose based on their individual liberty.
I never said you are a proponent of mandates because I note there are a few places shills don't mind crossing the line to get credibility. So you and other shills have said you don't believe in the mandates - I mean, who would agree with you if you supported them on FR. Just a token - while you go back and support everything else about the plandemic, including the false portrayal of Covid as 'needing' a 'vaccine' because it's so dangerous. it's a lie you endorse with all your posts when you push the vax - you push the lie that they are needed.
But the right to choose or not to choose does not translate into the right to demand therapies that are equivocal or disproven. They have no right to demand that I do something I believe to be wrong in terms of prescription. While I will not prescribe HCQ and ivermectin because I see no evidence clinically that they work having prescribed them, I am extremely quick to pull the trigger on monoclonals as these produce superior results.
You aren't a doctor. When I post about Ivermectin I'm posting about the obvious, overwhelmingly aggressive of denial of a patient's right to try a drug the FDA has already aproved years ago, infavor of a toxic 'vaccine' with an EUA and unprecendented death count. There simply is no comparison between safe Ivermectin and HCQ, and the clot shots. I never think about what you do or don't prescribe because you're not a real doctor. You're just claiming to be one to deceive FReepers into trusting your judgment as you shove the vax.
You are pretending the entire issue of teh public and many doctors asking for Ivermectin and being criminialized and ridiculed for trying to use it just doesn't exist. You shifted it to what you, in your imaginary doctor job, do with requests for Ivermectin. I'm so glad you're not a real doctor!
The fact is simply this — one side presents increasingly bizarre statements (graphene, magnetism, parasite eggs, radio markers, 5G issues) that are laughable on the the face.
Your list is inaccurate as usual (radio markers?) or I didn't post it. Actually the resesarchers put themselves and their careers on the line to report what they saw under a microscope and they weren't laughing. They were horrified and encourage us to pray, remind us that God wins. Many researchers now report blood cells stacked like coins - a condition called 'rouleaux' (spelling) post 'vaccine' and that is dangerous because the blood cannot function (carry oxygen) in that condition.
They present rumor and innuendo which is half way around the world before truth and observation puts on its running shoes.
I present Dr. Zelenko, Dr. McCullough, Steve Kirsch, Dr. John B., Dr. Hoffe, Dr. Corey etc. They aren't rumor and innuendo. Innuendo is your terrain - you wave them all away as the 'dirty dozen' because you can't refute them.
If you had any data, you would be able to refute Steve Kirsch and take that 1 million dollar prize. But all you are is ad hominem attacks and innuendo.
They reject the notion that Americans can and will create amazing things based on our heritage,
Dr. McCullough, Dr. Zelenko and others are doing just that. The CDC decided there would be no treatments, none at all, until a 'vaccine' was available. They killed countless people by having the hosptials send people home until they needed (deadly) ventilators. But Zelenko, McCullough and others rolled up their sleeves and created treatment protocols the CDC wanted to deny Americans.
...but want to hand tie our best of the best as pharmacy shills, Faucilytes, and right here on this forum, denigrating and insulting name calling (Froctors, assholes, why even bagster fresh off his vacation called me a pussy this evening — calling others mongoloid and subhuman — how this is allowed is beyond me).
You advocate for policies and the fake plandemic. You urge people to turn away from treatments that can save their lives and shove them toward hospitals, even knowing they had already been denied all treatment. You are contributing to hospitalization and death. Don't expect praise from me.
Perhaps they should not raise their voice when they should reinforce their arguments.
Doctor after doctor has presented protocols that work and you pretend they don't. Study after study, success story after success story has proven Ivermectin works, and you lie and say it doesn't. You seem to have placed yourself mentally upon a reviewing platform and you deny all the valid research and success that parades by you, declaring over and over again that there is no evidence. Just like the left's assertions there's no proof the 2020 election was stolen. You never put forth reasonable arguments - you put forth smear tactics and innuendos, Fauci talking points and fantasy descriptions of your supposed magic workplace where all the patient ratios (vax/unvax) are wildly differen tthan the rest of the world.
At the end of the day, we are approaching herd immunity secondary to vaccination and natural infection. There is no question this has been politicized and we even see it internally right here. By this time next year, I believe there will be no further CoVID stories, and life will be back to normal.
You'll be shoving the vax even while the people halt biden's regime with non compliance. You have already harmed so many with yor lies and fake medical degree, you'll never stop doing it now.
In conclusion, even the vaunted FLCCC states the following “The FLCCC Alliance has always maintained that our protocols are a bridge to vaccines and a safety net for those who cannot or have not been vaccinated or are vaccinated and have concerns regarding declining protection against emerging variants. VACCINES HAVE SHOWN EFFICACY IN PREVENTING THE MOST SEVERE OUTCOMES of COVID - 19 AND ARE AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE MULTIMODAL STRATEGY THAT MUST ALSO INCLUDE EARLY TREATMENT”
They saw what has been happening to America's Frontline Doctors and thought they could treat more patients if they were allowed to exist as an organization. Not they, and all other good doctors have stressed that early treatment is important, at a time when the CDC has decreed there will be NO EARLY TREATMENT.
Some doctors have taken that line - have chosen their battles in the hopes of reaching and saving more patients. No one denied they said it. We just focus on FReepers, friends and family who are suffering and dying, people in the news dying young, the lies pouring out about the bioweapons, the research pouring past the gate keepers and we say it ilike it is.
But they will never report that their own sources they quote often also endorse vaccinations.
These are the facts, and they are not in dispute.
Almost everything you said is innuendo opinion and distortion. You seldom if ever do facts. You act like we deny some sources support 'vaccines' when in fact we know those sources have political reasons to do so, and they spend the rest of their time rescuing people.
When will you debate Steve Kirsch? C'mon 1 million dollars could get you out of the basement and back to normal life.
You just can't win, Gassie.
