Posted on 10/12/2021 1:43:45 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Yes, I believe this was the study where when you delved into the data tables at the back of the study, it showed that the vaccinated people in the study were still contracting COVID at a comparable rate to the unvaccinated people in the study.
The pro-vaxxers never read past the “95%” figure in the intro...
“It’s not at all misleading to say the jab is 95% more effective than no jab.”
Yes, it’s definitely misleading. The data tables in the study showed there was barely any difference in the rates of contracting COVID by the vaccinated vs unvaccinated people in the study.
Hang them in the same manner as Il Duce Mussolini!
The question is—is the data valid?
Does the vaxx have a 95% harm reduction rate or not?
This is not difficult once you get past the name calling and finger pointing.
“Only 37,706 of 43,998 enrolled participants were included in final safety analysis. A reason for 6,292 enrolled participants not being included in final safety analyses was unable to be located within the New NEJM publication.”
posted 4 minutes ago by Threeballes
0 comments share save hide report block
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-restoring-public-trust-during-global-health-crisis
I hope so Travis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.