[bagster]

Okay, so what's the deal with people bowing down to these internet "Q Prophets" like this Juan O Savin dude?

Haven't we learned our lesson from watching the parade of wanna-be's traipsing through the Q movement?

I don't think Q said anything like the STORM or the GREAT AWAKENING was contingent on 80% participation.

I always took the 80% to mean the percentage of the people who would 'get it', finally, amongst other things.

Here are three times Q mentioned anything about 80%,

Nothing there even remotely implying that we must reach 80% AWAKENING in order for action to take place. This is a complete figment of this Juan O Savin's fertile, Q wanna-be imagination.

The moral of this story is, Juan O' Savin has his head way up in his culo. Let's step back from these pretenders and paytriots and think for ourselves. And trust ourselves. Come up with your own theories based on Q's actual information.

Juan O' Savin's brain is no better than yours.

[Ymani Cricket]

has his head way up in his culo.

Wow I havn't heard that word (Culo) since my grandma used it when I was a kid. (An Italian thing)

[Snowybear]

> Haven’t we learned our lesson from watching the parade of wanna-be’s traipsing through the Q movement?

Apparently not. It saddens me. Then I take a drink and I feel much better.

-SB

[RitaOK]

Nice redirect, there.

A really glaring improvement, bags, over the on-thread display of the #character poking replies.

To juxtapose old Q drops with this new Juan claim that I forwarded is a demo of an Objective approach for actally engaging the substance of a 107 claim and test it with Q.

Quite a relief from the kill the poster approach and my negative response(s) to being kilt. 🎃

[little jeremiah]

It’s a sort of addiction for people.