https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex- href=”mailto:l@eskimo.com”>l@eskimo.com/msg85732.html
Pons & Fleischmann’s results were never replicated.
***WHAT? Not Replicated? Where do you get that ridiculous and ignorant
claim?
Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated hundreds of times by more than a
thousand scientists, even in mainstream peer-reviewed journals.
https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/8k5n17605m135n22/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xwvgza45j4sqpe3wceul4dv2&sh=www.springerlink.com
.
Jing-tang He
• Nuclear fusion inside condense matters
• Frontiers of Physics in China
Volume 2, Number 1, 96-102, DOI: 10.1007/s11467-007-0005-8
This article describes in detail the nuclear fusion inside condense
matters—the Fleischmann-Pons effect, the reproducibility of cold fusions,
self-consistency of cold fusions and the possible applications
.
Note that Jing-tang He found there were 14,700 replications of the Pons
Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect.
http://www.boliven.com/publication/10.1007~s11467-007-0005-8?q=(%22David%20J.%20Nagel%22)
.
National Instruments is a multibillion dollar corporation that does not
need to stick its neck out for “bigfoot stories”. After noting more than
150 replications, they recently concluded that with so much evidence of
anomalous heat generation...
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf
Conclusion
• THERE IS AN UNKNOWN PHYSICAL EVENT and there is a need of better
measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating
innovation and discovery.
The current state of the science of LENR is that the Pons Fleischmann
Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated and it is an established
scientific fact. But it is not an established ENGINEERING field because the
effect is difficult to generate and there is still some lingering stigma
associated with the field. The level of pathological resistance this field
receives is unconscionable for those of us who seek scientific answers and
engineering solutions.
There are still some who put LENR at the same level as bigfoot.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex- href=”mailto:l@eskimo.com”>l@eskimo.com/msg120299.html
> The ongoing story here on Free Republic has been one where the detractors
> use ridicule, falsehoods, false argumentation, classic fallacies,
> misdirection, and all manner of unscientific and ugly behavior other than
> to discuss the science behind the claims. In order to fight fire with fire,
> I started calling these pathological skeptics “seagulls” but the moderator
> told me not to do that. So the skeptopaths are allowed certain tactics on
> FR but the LENR afficianados are not. It turns out that one of the
> moderators resigned, and his scientific background was lacking in terms of
> being able to properly absorb this material. At one time he even put it on
> the same level as BigFoot without backing it up when confronted:
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2917406/posts?page=3976#3976
>
>
> And even though the Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated hundreds of
> times by more than a thousand scientists, even in mainstream peer-reviewed
> journals.
To: ifinnegan
Bigfoot? Bigfoot hasn’t been replicated more than 150 times in peer-reviewed journals.
Asked & answered
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4000502/posts?page=5#5
National Instruments is a multibillion dollar corporation that does not
need to stick its neck out for “bigfoot stories”. After noting more than
150 replications, they recently concluded that with so much evidence of
anomalous heat generation...
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf
Conclusion
• THERE IS AN UNKNOWN PHYSICAL EVENT and there is a need of better
measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating
innovation and discovery.
The current state of the science of LENR is that the Pons Fleischmann
Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated and it is an established
scientific fact. But it is not an established ENGINEERING field because the
effect is difficult to generate and there is still some lingering stigma
associated with the field. The level of pathological resistance this field
receives is unconscionable for those of us who seek scientific answers and
engineering solutions.
9 posted on 4/26/2022, 11:04:55 AM by Kevmo