Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered
Kevin O’Malley Mon, 02 Dec 2013 19:11:49 -0800
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3097515/posts?page=62#62
What is amazing to me is that it’s OBVIOUSly an inductive pursuit right now
to figure out LENR, otherwise WE WOULD BE BUYING THEM. But skeptopaths
come onto inductive threads like this and act like their post is the
end-all, be-all that answers all questions: I’ll believe it when I can buy
it. It simply adds ZERO substance to the investigation. It is a form of
trolling, because you add in all kinds of snarky comments along the way.
Do you log onto other inductive threads the same way? Do you DEMAND to know
who’s going to win the 2014 elections? Do you log onto those threads and
say, “I’ll deal with this guy when he’s president, until then you all are
all just wasting your time.” No. Because such behavior is obvious trolling.
And if you DID post such nonsense, everyone would know you are a fool. But
here, you act like your foolishness is some kind of virtue.
It’s totally ridiculous. You can’t even answer one simple question about an
established scientific fact in the number of times this effect has been
replicated. You are a FOOL. And you can’t even see it.
62 — http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3097515/posts?page=62#62 — posted
on *Mon 02 Dec 2013 07:07:40 PM PST* by Kevmo
— http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/ —
— http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/ —
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Kevin O’Malley — kevmol...@gmail.com — wrote:
—
—
— I don’t know if these claims are ‘real’, I haven’t seen the device, nor
— personally ‘tested’ it.
— ***Raising the bar for cold fusion, lowering it for other things like hot
— fusion. You haven’t seen nor tested a huge range of scientific findings,
— but you aren’t engaged in hypercriticism of those developments. By such a
— standard you should be absolutely apoplectic over AGW
—
—
—
— When I can buy a $289 Cold-Fusion Water Heater, I’ll believe it. (Or various versions of technology).
—
— ***Raising the bar for cold fusion, lowering it for other things like hot fusion. Where is our hot-fusion flying car or jet pack? Why is controlled hot-fusion always 50 years away, and has been for the last 50 years?
—
We had someone use this fallacious form of argumentation today.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3998284/posts?page=83#83
Kevmo: especially since it has been replicated more than 150 times in peer reviewed journals. Stick that through your fallacy detector.
Amorphous: To date, not a single proven kW of electricity from a purposeful fusion reactor (hot or cold) has powered a consumer device, using less energy than it consumed, since man first purposely fused atoms 70 years ago. So, stick that through your reality detector, Mr. Fusion.