The blind squirrel caught a nut. She’s absolutely right, the conversation should be about the Marxist takeover of our liberty hidden in these bills.
Stupidity is strong in this one.....
Now the bartender thinks it would be a good idea to pass 3.5 trillion but only half fund it in years. This is a totally ludicrous solution, pass mandates but fund them for a year - I can’t imagine that bartender thinking will prevail.
AOC represents massive government debt in our printed, fiat currency, bloated government and leftist fantasy, immorality, and political cynicism it engenders. Its "late-empire" kind of stuff.
I am AOC and have an economics degree but number are higglely-pigglely. It’s what the outcome of what we are doing changing the world to serfdom that is important.
Let’s take some of that money and establish some civil liberties classes, maybe some gun safety classes, the civil rights group to investigate any bias groups, such as black or Hispanic member-only organizations, Maybe rewards for rounding up and deporting illegal aliens
Why is AOCommunist in Congress? One reason: Large, natural breasts on a slim body. It’s not for any measure of intelligence or leadership ability.
IF THEY PASS THIS DOES IT BECOME THE NEW ‘BASELINE’ BUDGET?
In other words will this then become the new yearly budget amount?
I guess money grows on trees in her ‘hood.
If libs knew the Sun is essentially a giant nuclear reactor, a fossil fuel juggernaut, they’d die of fright.
Ironically, AOC and her confreres treat government money as though it is there for the picking, perhaps buried in the ground just waiting for someone to find it and use it—sort of like fossil fuels. And she wants to use that “free” money to prove socialism works and in the process destroy the country to which socialists flee once their dreamy utopias inevitably turn into nightmares.
It’s a spending bill, Ms Cortez. It’s supposed to be about numbers.
I’ve had dogs and cats that were smarter than this kid.
So now we know AOC can’t count.
Andrew Jackson did it, so it is entirely possible for the government to take in more than it spends.