Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Ok I watched the video.

Right off the bat, I see a few differences between the headline and his actual statements.

He does mention CGI, deep fake, and photoshopping technology in the context of 9/11, and says we got played.

But to be fair, the only building he specifically claims was hit by a missile and not a plane was the Pentagon. And he claims Building No. 7 near the twin towers collapsed without anything hitting it.

I’m not defending him or suggesting he is not nuts. I’m just pointing out the headline is not 100% accurate.

After the last five years I have learned not to put anything past the government deep state.

But common sense and Occam’s Razor would suggest that the moon landing and 9/11 were real.

The way I see it, considering the technology and resources required to fake a moon landing and fool 7 billion to perpetuity - they have the technology and resources to land on the moon.

It’s seems much easier to actually go there than to fake it.

If I promised my wife I’d redo the kitchen floor, which would be easier, to fake that I did it - or to actually do it?


136 posted on 10/03/2021 9:41:33 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated
Well, he is right about Building 7 collapsing with nothing hitting it. Actually, that's not quite right, but the stuff that hit it wasn't enough to bring it down.

What brought it down was the fires, just like fires have brought down countless other buildings.

182 posted on 10/03/2021 10:03:10 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson