Posted on 10/03/2021 8:34:54 AM PDT by joesbucks
Pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood continues to promote conspiracy theories and misinformation at conservative events around the country, claiming at a Friday rally that no planes hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Trump said it may be the Saudis and not the Iraqis who were behind 9/11. Can you quote where Lin Wood said the same thing?
Did you watch what Lin Wood said in his YouTube clip?
He was speaking about all the sites. He said a missile hit the Pentagon. He also mentioned WTC-7. He said there were no aircraft parts found at any site, which is is contradicted by photographic evidence at the NPS Flight 93 Memorial site (in the case of the PA site).
I asked you specially about WTC-7 the WTC-7 reports as YOU made very specific claims about a report not being done very well. How do I know what report you are referring to?
I provided links to the sites regarding information I brought up. You initially didn’t - and then got attitude when you did. Grow up.
Sorry, few things are more indicative of a low IQ than believing the truther nonsense.
Here is another report on WTC-7 done at UAF. A link is provided so that people can read what the report says instead of getting it filtered through FReeper(s) who have attitude:
From the home page:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
The point is this:
Lin Wood is not your enemy. Those getting into your thoughts trying to turn you against him and others like him, THEY ARE YOUR ENEMY.
So the numerous eyewitnesses to the plane hitting the Pentagon are to be disbelieved but we should believe your claim that there are other witnesses who saw a missle? That is some Texas size BS you’re slinging, Slim.
A 155 foot long plane with 145 feet of wing crashed in Shanksville and made a ditch.
And evaporated. Completely except for a few pieces that could be carried in a car trunk.
And all the bodies evaporated.
But a wallet and passport of the hijacker was found.
And a 155 long plane made a (maybe) 75 foot incursion into the Pentagon, meaning half the plane would have been outside the wall still. The 145 foot wide wings managed to miss both light poles flanking the area, and the wings also disappeared into thin air with the rest of the plane.
But there wasn’t a 145 foot gash in the wall, if it went in sideways at 530 miles an hour, surely the wing on top would have landed somewhere? The tail section? It should be sitting in the parking lot. Where is it?
Are these the only 2 plane crashes (on land) to have magically evaporated?
I don’t care what names or insults you hurl at me. Lots of others are too afraid of people like you to speak up, and that’s how you like it. What agency do you work for? Ministry of Propaganda?
I’m done with you now. Have a nice day.
enough said
Thank you. There are few things that annoy me more than the truther BS, and it is embarrassing that too many conservatives, who claim to follow reason and logic, buy in to the nonsense.
No, I can’t quote that because I do not have that information and I wouldn’t quote it even if I had it because it must come through official channels. I might have a view or opinion, but not a quote.
I think it’s irrelevant what you are going on about.
Both men are on the same side. They want the American people to know the truth.
I do know something about Prince Alwaleed (Al Waleed bin Talal Al Saud) and I have posted that info many times over the years here and elsewhere.
Alwaleed was a product of elite education in UK and tied to global financiers. He has/had many tentacles inside the US and they were not all Saudis. They are/were on his payroll.
There’s a reason that Alwaleed was placed under House Arrest in SA after the Las Vegas shooting.
Likely, my opinion, Trump was referring to the Alwaleed network.
As for Lin Wood, the bottom line is Trump and Wood are not opposed to each other. They are aligned in getting the truth out.
> “photographic evidence at the NPS Flight 93”
Your links were unsolicited and irrelevant.
Flight 93 did not hit a building, did it?
How many times do you need to be told that Wood referred to WTC and Pentagon, NOT Flight 93?
The OFFICIAL reports found no AC remains around WTC or the Pentagon.
The unofficial news stories were never proven.
Wood, as a lawyer, is going to use official reports, not news stories because those are considered hearsay in a court of law.
> “I asked you specially about WTC-7 the WTC-7 reports as YOU made very specific claims about a report not being done very well. How do I know what report you are referring to?”
You really are an AH aren’t you?
nist.gov
Search: Final Report Collapse Building 7
Only one such report.
Find it.
No, I never said any of that and you are not welcome in TX, I guarantee that.
The missile witnesses were for the Pentagon, not WTC.
But your lame reading ability didn’t catch that, did it?
If Newsweek is reporting this, it’s got to be BS.
Good Gawd!
You just summarized the nonsense in this thread in three words.
Do you have any idea how your comment gives vapors to the thread’s idiot chamber?
I’ve been having fun with them today but for the purpose of educating the lurking class.
I have not hurled names or insults at you. I WANT you to post about 09/11. So people see what is being said and who is saying it.
Regarding bodies, it seems there were bodies found at the Pentagon:
-see https://www.wired.com/2001/09/bodies-unearthed-from-pentagon/
I'm ordering this book tomorrow, as it has quite a few details regarding bodies found, and recovery efforts:
Pentagon 09/11 - see https://books.google.com/books/about/Pentagon_9_11.html?id=vN-3XqbuyfsC
My lame reading ability did catch that you were referring to the Pentagon, and you’re still slinging bullschiff.
Now I know Lin Wood is nuts, just as I had always supposed.
my Question is did lin Wood actually say that or did they twist his words .... I am sure he talked about deep fakes but I am betting that every thing is conflated in the speech. I believe the news week article is taking the speech and putting together different talking points from the speech together to create a different meaning.
I said if in my original post too. Have a nice day.
Oh my, did we forget to change our Depends?
Don’t forget to wear your Mouth Diaper!
Ta-Ta!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.