[bagster]

I don’t understand the question. Or why it pertains really.

Seriously? Didn't you just make it seem like 'bloggers' running ads was the devils work, and somehow invalidated the content of their blogs.

Don't run from your ridiculous opinions, Chase, when the hypocrisy is pointed out. Own them.

[David Chase]

“ Seriously? Didn’t you just make it seem like ‘bloggers’ running ads was the devils work, and somehow invalidated the content of their blogs.”
—————————————————————————————-

I believe I spoke specifically about Pro-Vaccine Bloggers, not Bloggers in general.

But, if the New York Times were to suddenly start running stories praising President Trump, would their readers and advertisers react kindly?

[David Chase]

Now if a Pro-Vaccine Blog were to start posting articles claiming the Vaccines are harmful and even deadly……..would their followers/readers, and clickable ads be happy with that??

They would need to tweak their clickie ads, now wouldn’t they?

Do the ads in the New York Times match their readers? Yes.

Do the ads at a Pro-Vaccine Blog suit their readers? Yes, of course.

Do either of those two get paid if no one comes to or buys their Blog/Newspaper? No

So they must satisfy their customers. The readers, the visitors.

It’s a business, capitalism.