Find one post where I have defended Fauci or the CDC. Just one. What you posted looks like an attempt to shut down discussion because you don’t like it when FReepers hold viewpoints counter to yours and challenge viewpoints posted by you.
Rachel Maddow uses the same tactic you do. A critic of hers said she always acted like the one piece of information that was missing was the only piece needed to exposue culpability. As information was obtained, she found one more question to ask, and another, and another.
Expose culpability? I would have been satisfied if Young had posted the initial FOIA request along with the agency replies. The initial FOIA requests can sometimes have information that provides additional information on where the requestor is “coming from” viewpoint wise. I believe that’s relevant info.
Your empty question just kicks the can down the road. The evidence against these horrific bioweapons is sky high but you still have one more question to ask - as if a last ditch innuendo will erase everything we've seen and experienced for almost 2 years now. You imply if only we knew the answer to your question, the CDC, Fauci and their minions would be proven innocent victims of the people sacrificing their reputations and careers to get the truth past the censors.
The phrase “The evidence against these horrific bioweapons is sky high” sounds oddly like Al Gore’s “the science is settled”, or like any number of scientists or public policymakers that support vaccinations or lockdowns, etc. In other words, an attempt to shut down discussion.
The CDC lied and said that Covid was novel...or the CDC intentionally forces everyone to use the PCR test even though they know it's invalid...or the CDC intentionally withholds treatment and it's protocols clearly kill people, or they guilt pregnant women into getting an experimental 'vaccine' that's killing people in record numbers. You just have one more question to ask….
You do know that there is a differing viewpoint on your claim that “the CDC intentionally forces everyone to use the PCR test even though they know it's invalid” - see https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-viral-posts-misrepresent-cdc-announcement-on-covid-19-pcr-test/
And yes, I do have more questions to ask on many issues. My apologies if that triggers you. May I make a suggestion - aspire to conduct yourself the way Alex Berenson does - always inquisitive, goes where the information takes him, and isn’t trying to advance a narrative.
I don't like it when FReepers support the bioweapons and the people using them against Americans. Some advid supporters of the Regime's eugenics program are more subtle, like you are, in denying all harm and having no curiosity or questions that could possibly point to the harzards. Curiously, all your urgent queries are attempts to undermine any information that makes it past the censors.
Expose culpability? I would have been satisfied if Young had posted the initial FOIA request along with the agency replies.
No. You would continue to undermine. You don't go the research route - you go the 'but can we be sure beyond all reasonable doubt? Are there unanswered questions....?" route. It's just you don't care that nothing the CDC says is true, or that physicians are reporting vaccine harm. Your questions will be framed to only cast doubt on legitimate concerns about the treasonous CDC and the toxic 'shots'.
The initial FOIA requests can sometimes have information that provides additional information on where the requestor is “coming from” viewpoint wise. I believe that’s relevant info.
Why doesn't relevant information about the clot shots, or China's bioweapons interest you? You're here to undermine and you bat your eyes and say, "Who? Me? I was just asking a question!" when confronted.
The phrase “The evidence against these horrific bioweapons is sky high” sounds oddly like Al Gore’s “the science is settled”, or like any number of scientists or public policymakers that support vaccinations or lockdowns, etc. In other words, an attempt to shut down discussion.
PERFECT example of your deflection technique in action. You actually wrote that without acknowledgeding that the CDC has been blaring "THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!" about 'vaccines' which have never succeeded in making it to human trials before because of the damage done. Not one successful vaccine from this technology before, but the CDC and it's handmaidens batter those who so much as ask a question.
Masks, Lockdowns, 'vaccines', Ivermectin - all of it declared 'settled' by the CDC over the objections of people with time tested research and successful treatment protocols. Historic abuses of Human and Constitutional Rights are invisible to you. The entire attack on America is invisible to you - you spend your time looking for ways to portray attempts to defend against it as ignorant or biased. THANK YOU for proving my point, even if you had to dig up Al Gore to do it.
You do know that there is a differing viewpoint on your claim that “the CDC intentionally forces everyone to use the PCR test even though they know it's invalid” - see https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-viral-posts-misrepresent-cdc-announcement-on-covid-19-pcr-test/
You do know the 'factcheck.org' websites are George Soros/MSM disinformation best friends,right? You're here ignoring obvious information and using MSM 'fact check orgs' and asking "MSM narrative' questions and implying it's all just 'coincidence.' You again can't consider or take any interest in the fact that the CDC doesn't have a valid test for Covid and knows it. The CDC warns about variants but doesn't have a valid test for that, either. No - you won't acknowledge the war. You only scan for ways to undermine any legitimate concern and attempt to warn patriots.
And yes, I do have more questions to ask on many issues. My apologies if that triggers you. May I make a suggestion - aspire to conduct yourself the way Alex Berenson does - always inquisitive, goes where the information takes him, and isn’t trying to advance a narrative.
I have been asking questions since before these 'vaccines' were launched. I 've been researching the pharmas, the trials, the FDA filings, the CDC protocols, hospital protocols, medications, international research, Pub Med, and many related topics (e.g., chemistry, genetics, medical policy and politics etc.) to answer my own questions with facts.
You don't look for answers, you just ask questions, some of which would require mind-reading or otherwise unavailable information to answer, "Why didn't he...?" in order to imply the truth would be exposed as opposite the assertions if not for that 'one missing piece' of information.
Your kind will always question information supplied THAT OPPOSES THE NARRATIVE. However, no amount of shocking, unprecedented behavior can inspire the slightest curiousity in you if it could have been written by the CDC, or Fauci himself. Your undermining requires NOTHING but 'why?' or innuendo on your part.
I reject your 'suggestion' as I have already been seeking and finding answers to questions by researching while you just sit back and chip away at patriots, while the biowarfare wages on all around us.