The first whistleblower, Erica Beardsley, is mentioned by name. Good. But as for the second whistleblower, the article just says that some unnamed reporter talked to some unnamed nurse.
I get that the second nurse wouldn’t want to be named. But I don’t get why the reporter would also want to remain anonymous. That kinda hurts his credibility.
“But I don’t get why the reporter would also want to remain anonymous. “
Same reason why they want to be anonymous. Put yourself in the reporter’s shoes: are you willing to be attacked on media, personally and threatened? James O Keefe can put up with it but not a lot can.