Very skeptical of this. She “received word”. What exactly does that mean? Email? Phone call? Video conference? Memo?
She provides no specific unit organization, or POC at Fort Hood (Darnall?), yet this paragraph is held out as a central tenant to her request the flight crews be grounded.
So a judge is supposed to take her word based on Long “receiving word”?
Needs to be independent confirmation.
You enjoy playing devil’s advocate. It suits you.
“… Very skeptical of this. She “received word”. What exactly does that mean? Email? Phone call? Video conference? Memo?…”
*******************************************************
You left out “auditory hallucinations”.
The judge is not reading a webpage snippet like you. DUH.
Yeah, I’m getting more than a whiff of “servers in Germany” here. This type of fantastical stuff is not helpful for our side.