Notice in the drop it says:
Non_important [yet]
That reads non UNDERSCORE important. What is underscored? "important". When? in the future.
1 + 1 = 2
True.
Non_important [yet].
Think [leak investigation]
Think Horowitz [Midyear] re: FBI_media assets
"We identified numerous FBI employees at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters. Some of those media contacts were social in nature too, including drinks and meals after work, going to sporting events and playing golf."
Think WL HRC_Podesta media asset(s) list.
They always [use] the same contacts.
MSM assets complicit? [knowingly]
Q
-----------------
Now. Note:
"The OIG initiated this audit to determine whether the significant accuracy-related errors found in that December 2019 OIG report were indicative of a more widespread problem with the FBI’s compliance with its Woods Procedures. In March 2020, we issued a Management Advisory Memorandum (MAM) to report that our preliminary audit work had identified Woods Procedures non-compliance in all 29 FISA applications we reviewed, which were approved by the FISC between fiscal years 2015 and 2019."
I note: " If the FBI falls short of its own standards for accuracy, it risks impinging on the civil liberties of U.S. persons, and adversely affecting its credibility with the FISC, Congress, and the public, which in turn could lead to restrictions or even revocation of its authorization to use this important investigative tool in support of its national security mission.
On page 13: Christopher Steele
"Given the importance of a source characterization statement to the FISC’s determination of a source's reliability, the failure to comply with the Woods Procedures was a significant error on the part of the FBI case agents involved and their supervisors. Moreover, this issue compounded other serious problems with the subsequent FISA renewal applications, such as the FBI’s continued reliance on Steele’s information despite the fact that the Primary Sub-source, during his FBI interviews, had contradicted Steele’s reporting on several critical issues.
Also on page 13: ..."failure to seek and document the handling agent’s approval of the source characterization statement for Christopher Steele in the FISA applications,.."
Page 24:
.."we believe that the FBI and NSD’s messaging did not convey the seriousness of the identified systemic non-compliance with the Woods Procedures and the correlated risk,"
Summary ii: "we believe certain public statements from the FBI and NSD in 2020 failed to recognize the significant risks posed by systemic non-compliance with the Woods Procedures,"
Now Drop 3689
Note this part:
1. Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
2. Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.") OR
3. Some combination of the above.
>>7517634
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q