“Not a very nice subject, treasonous secession and slave owing.”
I leap to the conclusion that you think advocating consent of the governed is treason, and that any people with a connection to human bondage are disqualified from self government.
I respect your opinion. But to be clear, are you making a reference to the first American revolution or the second?
A war started by Southern plutocrats and slave holders bent on maintaining an economic system based on the use of slave labor. A civil war isn't a ''revolution''. That's what Marxists and Democrats call it. The American Revolution was a breaking away from the tyrannical grip of the English monarchy. Abraham Lincoln was the duly elected president of The United States. King George was a British aristocrat granted ''the divine right'' to be a tyrant.