There is little mercy shown for the personal back story of some of these video commentators.
And, we are not adults, after all.
We cannot type any utterance these people claim regarding current events, Q related themes, their MIL contacts, etc., because... their backstory.
No. Instead, their backstory must wag the dog. Their Backstory must overwhelm, even their Q related message.
Their Backstory will be ‘peated and repeated, until you Stop.
Eg., Simon Parkes, longtime conservative, served in London government, or somewhere nearby. British MI5 mother. M16 grandfather.
You think he didn’t grow up knowing some people, and about others, who were British Intel players? No possibility of maybe lifetime connections with other kids, with MI parents, in London?
The Guardian hated him. He was not re-elected. Simon was associated with outer space, aliens, repulsive alien sex crap no one wanted to know or hear about.
It happens in this example, that the promotion of alien crap is forbidden on FR. Poster didn’t mention that subject, didn’t know of any connection of that “crap” or of it as related to Simon.
Simon had discussed only Q intel and MIL intel. Poster posted only THAT.
Whoa. Q Poster was going to cost us the Q thread for mentioning his Name, for posting his Q claims, on a Q thread, over a forbidden subject no one ever heard of, and about which was.never.posted.
Surreal.
Suddenly EVERYONE was hearing reams of the whole sordid details of the Forbidden subject.. but not from the poster.
So mentioning any certain names provokes a magnificent squawk, having Nothing to do with their current message nor with what you just typed of it.
We are not adults, after all.
We cannot address particulars, or substance alone. We must wag the dog, or Stop.
Clearly, some of these alternative media people are wounded, some are probably lost souls, wounded warriors, abused as kids, several.. certainly never near a church.
Their untidy life experience does not fit our standard. Their affected brain and life experience doesn’t wear ours.
We are not adults, after all.
We have no critical thinking skills.
We can’t separate tares from wheat.
Because of their personal backstory, any experience they own, any current or longtime source they claim, or opinion, or information they hold, must be Crushed.
We are a Cancel Culture, after all.
Here, have a brace for your brain. đ
I understand your point. Critical thinking is an analysis of information to form a judgement. A blanket disregard or rejection of EVERYTHING a person says because we didnât approve of one or some things a person said is the opposite of critical thinking. Nobody is ever 100% wrong or 100% right. Q told us 25 different times to âThink for yourself.â I believe the most important part of that advice was âThinkâ.
Iâve listened to a handful of Scott McKayâs podcasts and I didnât come away any of those times with the impression that he was interpreting scripture in a blasphemous way. It would appear that he had guests on his show who have done that, but I donât know that their opinions were/are McKayâs opinions. My goal today isnât to defend McKay, just to clarify that he didnât espouse the offensive opinions. His guests did, and I think his listeners that day were even cautioned about what they were about to hear.
McKay may indeed be a high priest in Satanâs club, he may have simply exercised poor judgement in having those guests, or he may have lost his scheduled guest at the last minute and knew those clowns would accept a last minute invitation to fill air time. I donât know his motivation to give them a platform to air their silliness. I do know that âknowingâ one thing about a person doesnât mean I know everything about a person.
Or maybe because of their personal front story.
What kind of thinking person doesn't realize that welcoming, quoting, and trusting the information of verified whack jobs harms our movement? That 'following' nuts gives ammunition to the enemy?
We don't know that, because we are not adults.
