Oh, snap. Is that what this guy believes?
If that is true, how does he account for JFK's daddy, the notorious gangster and booze smuggler Joseph Kennedy?
Not too Jesusy, you ask me. And then there's Teddy boy.
Oh, snap. Is that what this guy believes?
If that is true, how does he account for JFK's daddy, the notorious gangster and booze smuggler Joseph Kennedy?
Not too Jesusy, you ask me. And then there's Teddy boy.
The obvious flaw with the scenario, from a theological perspective is that if Jesus had a baby with Mary, as an observant Jew, he would have been committing fornication and therefore not be sinless and able to redeem. So they say his Davidic bloodline continues to the Kennedy’s. From their perspective, Since they believe in reincarnation and in “ascending” and self atoning, there is no need for the salvation on the cross from a sinless Jesus because they can become divine in their own right through many incarnations to self perfection. So there is the conflict of world views. Reincarnation, if thought logically through, eliminates the need for redemption through the cross. And I’m not getting into a theological debate but am just pointing out how their view is no problem for them but it is for the Christian and Christian doctrine. The opinion I WILL assert is that reincarnation is mathematically impossible without stretching things to completely made up ideas of the soul. But the point is, like you said, preconceived ideologies impress a different view of what Q is about. And will likely lead to disappointment for many. We just want our country back and restored to the original intent of the founding fathers. Other Patriots can disagree with me on that and that’s fine. We have bigger battles to worry about than theological ones at present, as it pertains to saving America and what’s left of the free world. By default, at present, Brazil’s Bolsonaro is the leader of the free western world. But the point remains that kooky crap makes anons look ridiculous.