Approved in 6 months?
Anyhow, Attorney Robert Barnes says the FDA approval is not what the public thinks. This is because once the FDA approves a vaccine it has to by law revoke all the Emergency Use Authorizations (aka EUAs) of all the other vaccines. They did not reverse and revoke Pfizer’s EUA, Moderna’s EUA and Johnson & Johnson EUA.
Under Federal Law EUAs cannot be issued if there is already an FDA approved drug on the market. The way Big Pharma got around that with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc.. is to say they are only looking at other “vaccines”. Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are not considered vaccines. That the game they have been playing.
Plus under EUA there is no liability. Pfizer actually does not want FDA approval because then they are liable. What they approved is not even on the market.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3994236/posts?page=55#55
Enlightened1 wrote:
“Approved in 6 months?
Anyhow, Attorney Robert Barnes says the FDA approval is not what the public thinks. This is because once the FDA approves a vaccine it has to by law revoke all the Emergency Use Authorizations (aka EUAs) of all the other vaccines. They did not reverse and revoke Pfizer’s EUA, Moderna’s EUA and Johnson & Johnson EUA.
Under Federal Law EUAs cannot be issued if there is already an FDA approved drug on the market. The way Big Pharma got around that with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc.. is to say they are only looking at other “vaccines”. Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are not considered vaccines. That the game they have been playing.
Plus under EUA there is no liability. Pfizer actually does not want FDA approval because then they are liable. What they approved is not even on the market.”
Many thanks for this information!!!
Ping!