Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla

I wasn’t defending Remdesevir, just saying that - in toto - the “nurse’s” claims need to be viewed with caution because the person is anonymous and the claims can’t be verified. For example, if we knew the specific hospital, we could check to see if they really are using Remdesevir and really were using Ivermectin at one time but discontinued it.


48 posted on 09/09/2021 10:02:12 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

I’m always trust but verify.

That’s why I took a quick look at the VAERS data for Remdesevir.

What I saw jibes with what the anonymous alleged nurse was asserting.

Also, the fact that the drug is considered a covered countermeasure by the PREP Act might help explain why it’s being pushed rather Ivermectin, which is not.

The alleged nurse gave us info to check out.

So far, some of it does.


52 posted on 09/09/2021 10:11:50 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle

I know a pastor who was recently, within the last month, in the hospital for Covid and was given Remdesivir. They are still using it.

By the grace of God, he weathered it just fine.


133 posted on 12/13/2021 7:07:18 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson