|
Posted on 09/08/2021 8:29:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
Students just taught school administrators the
difference between a mandate and a law!
7:59 AM · Sep 8, 2021·Twitter Web App
Watch the whole clip. 'Officials' have 'mandates'. Students have Constitutional rights!
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Fight breaks out after school board in Missouri votes for mask mandate
I just started checking into Niatonin theory, as posted on our thread. It appears to be a shared discussion among different peeps so I'll just address my remarks to the general group. One of the early posts I found was this one:
So I checked out Part 1.
I take issue with Part 1. (more about that in a moment). Further, I take issue with the article posted immediately below Part 1 by the same author.
Covid-19 Vaccines Save Lives. This is not a contentious fact | by Gideon M-K; Health Nerd | Medium
First, he makes the 'causation vs correlation' argument common to our Branch Covidians to disprove concerns over Covid vaccines. He starts by acknowledging VAERS is supposed to be a signal, and in my opinion then goes on to dismiss the signal function entirely.
He seems to double-down, repeating a Covidian talking point:
"This has previously led to things like car accidents being recorded in these systems..."
The CDC gives itself 4 to 6 weeks to vett any new report submitted to VAERS. You can't upload directly (bypass) the CDC. I have spent many hours looking at VAERS resports (specific patient records) and never found any extraneous reports that didn't belong there.
Key isues with VAERS data (withholding large numbers of records, thousands of reports of death following Covid 'vaccination' compared with all other vaccines in VAERS 30 year history) are never mentioned. It doesn't matter whether you argue causation or not (as he does), the 'causation vs correlation' issue existed in prior years as well, so NOTHING explains the extremely disproportionate amounts of adverse events reported post Covid 'vaccination'.
There's JUST SO MUCH evidence of vaccine harm and this author sees ZERO reason concern and endorses Covid vaccines without reservation, before moving on to attack Ivermectin's reputation as fraudulent.
From the Covid article he wrote, "The bottom line here is quite simple — regardless of how you calculate it, if you use the correct figures Covid-19 vaccines are tremendously life-saving. This is not particularly surprising, because vaccines are generally one of the best interventions out there when it comes to cost-benefit as they tend to be so low risk."
So this supposed statistician promotes both the false perception of the 'death toll' of Covid illness and vaunted safety of the Covid 'vaccines'. That's a two-fer.
In my opinion author seizes on nits to pick (e.g., how valid is VAERS ) and denies the existance of anything that contradicts his position. This means he is ignoring the obvious problems and all the experts (Dr. Malone, Dr. Yeadon, Dr. McCullough, Dr. Mikovits, Dr. Tenpenny etc. etc. etc.) and all the other inputs.
He has selected portions of the covid 'vaccine' debate he feels are most vulnerable to criticism, just like our trolls do, and 'sets the table' (what will, and will not form the basis of legitimate opinon) in such a way that far more overwhelming data sources are ignored.
Quoting him, "So it might surprise you that I got a first dose of the Astrazeneca vaccine in April, and I’m getting my second dose today. Ultimately, my nerves are trumped by my knowledge that catching Covid-19 is much more harmful than any of the vaccines that we’ve developed so far."
NO SALE!
In my opinion, this appears to be blatant trolling. Not a good sign for someone putting forth the argument that 1) Ivermectin treatments for Covid is based on fraud and 2) Niatonin is better.
So, back to Part 1 re Niatonin and its implications for use of Ivermectin in the treatment of Covid.
Overall, the author, Gideon M-K; Health Nerd, does the same injustice to the Ivermetcin issue that he does with the vaccine issue. He 'sets the table' to include/exclude information, this time with a flawed Ivermectin study, and pulls it apart, all the while implying he's addressing the central consideration re the use of Ivermetcin in Covid.
In my opinion, the author pretends the true considerations supporting the use of Ivermectin do not exist. There could be 10 flawed studies he could discuss, but what about all the survival? All the hundreds of other studies, even the Nobel prize and the reputations of those who support its use are of more value than the study he makes the centerpiece of his analysis.
The title he gives his analysis is inflammatory (no pun) at a time when citizens all over the world are denied access to appropriate medical treatment.
I reject Part 1 of his analysis, and his Covid vaccine promotion completely. I will look through parts 2 and 3, but I am no longer optimistic because there is something, I believe, intentional behind his opinions that does not bode well.
A research analysis that 'sets the table' with only the weakest data points and excludes all else, while exhorting the safety of Covid vaccines is, in my opinion, at the very least, unethical.
The Global Reset: Population reduction via 'vaccine" 1, Decimate the elderly population = No need to pay pensions. ( plausible deniability due to age and co morbidities)
2. 40-60: Dead due t variety of ailments that are vaccine induced over a period of time.
3. 20-40 yrs: Death or sterilization
4. Children: Death, sterilization, mental incapacity.
...then...5G will do the rest. How? Spike protein is a fusogenic protein, which your body is now producing as a result of the mRNA. It will destabilize cellular lipid bilayers, wherever it is being produced. Multiple mechanisms will be permanently disrupted.
Brilliantly lethal...
---> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053430/
"The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier"
At Gab @alane69
"When did products start coming with Zombie exclusions in the small print?"
Shared from: @AltSkullMirror, Telegram
Video of guy looking up Amazon Terms
So, of course, I checked it out first:
https://aws.amazon.com/service-terms/
Under section 42 - 42. Amazon Lumberyard Engine
42.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical or safety-critical systems, such as use in operation of medical equipment, automated transportation systems, autonomous vehicles, aircraft or air traffic control, nuclear facilities, manned spacecraft, or military use in connection with live combat. However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.
"First the CDC page, now this. I don't buy the excuse that on an exhaustive legal notarized document, that Amazon was just having fun. Surely their lawyers go through this stuff with a fine-toothed comb 🤔"
"I'd not worry about this guy, he can't even use ctrl-F to find the word zombie..."
"Lumberyard is the AWS gaming framework. A few games are using it now. Its will have stuff like that. New world game and star citizen use it. It was probably written and handed to legal because the coders didn't believe anyone ever read this crap anyway."
Thanks and good morning!
42.10. Acceptable Use; Safety-Critical Systems. Your use of the Lumberyard Materials must comply with the AWS Acceptable Use Policy. The Lumberyard Materials are not intended for use with life-critical or safety-critical systems, such as use in operation of medical equipment, automated transportation systems, autonomous vehicles, aircraft or air traffic control, nuclear facilities, manned spacecraft, or military use in connection with live combat. However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.
~~~~
I don’t know how it got in there, exactly, but with the rise of Zombie movies, books the annual FEMA publication (about 2 years ago, maybe) which provides public service information to prepare for disasters used a “Prepare for the Zombie Apocalypse” theme, and apparently we’ve gone downhill from there?
Good to be in...
Well, people didn’t need the vax to prove they are already zombies…
In after posting in Festival at 6am. 🤓
Thank you for all you do for us!
🌸🌼🌺
There’s that Australian tranny dude again. Evil cabalist baphomet-worshipping minion of the devil. Death To Tyrants!
Brilliantly lethal...
-—> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33053430/
“The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier”
~~~~~~~~~~~
Okay, but so far SARS has never been isolated from people. Dr. Mikovits recognizes parts of the SARS Cov2 research from the cell lines she developed at the NIH decades ago. Back then, she developed monkey kidney cell lines to support research (the cells wouldn’t die from the exposures to toxins/pathogens).
So when we are shown research studies, she goes and finds the original papers written, and they are not in people cells.
Then when people say they’ve isolated SARS Cov2, she researches those papers, and they are always...monkey kidney cells.
With all the people sick with Covid, they still haven’t isolated it. I do see claims it’s isolated everywhere, all day, many times a day in every lab across the world. However those are not ‘registered’ Covid isolates - they can literally be anything.
So we have multiple theories in play (graphene oxide, SARS Cov2 virus) and lies everywhere, but so far there seems to be a legitimate reason why the average researcher (not paid for by CDC funds, Gates affiliations etc.) cannot get registered isolates.
Maybe it’s a combination of tactics which varies, and is tweaked with time. Different weapons for different venues. People are getting sick, but the PCR doesn’t identify what illness(es) they have. So we likely have a mix of respiratory illnesses and some patients with toxins like graphene oxide (from Covid or other recent injections/vaccines etc.) but until white hats can explain more of this, I try not to get too concerned with the latest claims about the research behind Covid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
