[blueplum]

you're being misleading.

In cell culture in doses that cannot be achieved in humans.

“very high concentrations relative to what you would find in the plasma of a treated person or an animal, which would be 20 to 50 times lower.’”

and which would constitute an overdose in humans.

“the standard doses of ivermectin that we use for people are never going to reach the levels that would be effective in against the virus “

this is collaborated in the article by “Dr Jim Morris, a professor at the Eukaryotic Pathogens Innovation Center at Clemson University, in South Carolina,”

at best, ivermectin presents a 70% efficacy, and only with early application, but, how do we know that, if those who are using it are almost exclusively in the 80% survival rate group, anyway? i.e., under 40

[Dr. Sivana]

you're being misleading.

If so, not on purpose. I commented only after skimming the article, and as is often the case with the Daily Mail, they do their own misleading bit, assuming everyone is taking a horse-sized dose, and implying that the drug is only good for treating farm animals for parasites.