Where is the peer review for this?
Where is the peer review for the "*vaxxine*" ?
Where is the clinical control group data for the two and a half months of testing ? (that was aledgedly destroyed 'by accident')
How long before there will be an authentic autopsy on deceased participants of the "*vaxxine", as to the real cause of death ??
Who controls the research money on vaccine toxicity - Fauci / NIH !!
Where is the peer review for this?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IT’s in censored publications written by physicians stripped of their jobs, laboratories, reputations for having a different medical opinion from that of Royal Court PHysician Anthony Fauci, along side other research denied publication for espousing ‘wrong thoughts.’
You’re asking for information that pertains to a system and a set of rules and protocols that has been abandoned by the establishment.
What mattered before no longer has any relevance, not in the context of “covid.”
Have you not seen this yet?
It’s not a clinical trial or study of efficacy, so no peer review is necessary.
Peer review is a process of having neutral third parties of similar industrial position and credentials look at a study of contrasts to ensure ethical presentation.
This is a report of biochemical findings that should be easily replicated or challenged. It is published on the scientist’s own website.
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines
Dr. Young provides a list of materials and a step by step procedure that can easily be verified by other interested lab scientists. He merely confirms the EXISTENCE of undisclosed ingredients of the genetic modifiers (so-called “Vaccines”).
To publish this in a science journal would likely require 3rd party review (peer review) assuming any journal would choose to publish it.