Re Xiden call with Afgahn leader:
Biden lauded the Afghan armed forces, which were trained and funded by the U.S. government. “You clearly have the best military,” he told Ghani. “You have 300,000 well-armed forces versus 70-80,000 and they’re clearly capable of fighting well.” Days later, the Afghan military started folding across provincial capitals in the country with little fight against the Taliban.
In much of the call, Biden focused on what he called the Afghan government’s “perception” problem. “I need not tell you the perception around the world and in parts of Afghanistan, I believe, is that things are not going well in terms of the fight against the Taliban,” Biden said. “And there is a need, whether it is true or not, there is a need to project a different picture.”
Biden told Ghani that if Afghanistan’s prominent political figures were to give a press conference together, backing a new military strategy, “that will change perception, and that will change an awful lot I think.”
The American leader’s words indicated he didn’t anticipate the massive insurrection and collapse to come 23 days later. “We are going to continue to fight hard, diplomatically, politically, economically, to make sure your government not only survives, but is sustained and grows,” said Biden.
https://populist.press/bombshell-biden-transcript-leaked-huge-coverup-began-in-july/
Active duty U.S. military members are suing Joe Biden’s Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and the Department of Defense and Biden administration officials Xavier Becerra and Janet Woodcock and the agencies they lead in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
Here is the lawsuit: “Plaintiffs SSG Dan Robert, U.S. Army, and SSgt Hollie Mulvihill, USMC, are both active-duty service members currently serving the United States Armed Forces. The Plaintiffs represent the class of at least 220,000 thousand currently-serving U.S. servicemen and women who can document that they have already been infected with COVID-19, recovered from it, and thereby acquired natural immunity from the virus. Plaintiffs filed suit with this court on August 17, 2021, to vindicate their rights, including their right to be free from unwanted physical intrusion, to reserve their guaranteed, codified and fundamental rights of informed consent; and to be free from involuntary inoculation against a virus that poses statistically zero threat to them. Forcibly inoculating the Plaintiffs class will provide no benefit to them and will cause significant and irreparable physical harm and or death. Worst of all, existing laws and regulations unequivocally provide the exemption Plaintiffs seek, yet the Defendant DoD by and through its Secretary Austin, has issued a mandate ignoring the DoD’s own regulations and creating an entirely new definition of “full immunity” that can only be achieved by this forced vaccination. In so doing, the Defendants are acting ultra vires in derogation of Plaintiffs’ rights, in violation of existing laws, regulations, medical ethics, and the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence.