[rxsid]

Furthermore, The FDA admits there are "serious" concerns on the safety of the recently "approved" Pfizer injection, and that there is a need for long term safety data.

They are REQUIRING them to conduct several multi-year studies on what THEY, the FDA are saying are "known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis"

FDA "Approval" of Pfizer Injection COMIRNATY States There Were No Concerns Or Controversial Issues - Yet - Pfizer Is Required To Conduct Several Long Term Studies
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3988135/posts

[rxsid]

And for the record, the decision to grant (or not) a Biologics License Application for Pfizer's injection was due by January 2022.
Moderna's is around that timeframe as well.
Janssens expect to file for the BLA sometime later this year making any decision due by later in 2022.
https://www.fdanews.com/articles/203794-fda-reassigns-staff-to-accelerate-full-approval-for-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine

Why, with all the clear signs out there....and admission (booster shot needed) that the injection efficacy was falling....did they feel the need to rush the "approval," while also admitting they don't know the "serious" long term affects?

This was ALL about political science (i.e. politics) and NOT about science.