I was responding to what moonhawk said;
“Chemically, yes, legally, no. The difference being that if you are one of the unfortunate ones who react adversely to the experimental drug, you have no legal recourse if you get the one that is still operating under the EUA. And that is the only one available here in the US.”
His point stands. Fully approved should put it under VCIP, is it under VCIP?
dynoman wrote: “His point stands. Fully approved should put it under VCIP, is it under VCIP?”
From the link you provided: “FDA APPROVAL OF COVID-19 VACCINES DOES NOT MEAN VICP APPROVAL Unfortunatley, FDA approval does NOT mean the COVID-19 vaccines are automatically added to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).”
You’re trying to make things up, that unless it’s a part of VICP, it isn’t ‘fully approved’ which clearly isn’t the case.
BTW, also from your link: “Right now the VICP does NOT cover COVID-19 vaccine reactions. We believe that’s going to change soon.”
What excuse will the anti-vaxxers come up when that happens?