So, when BLM and Antifa violently decided to ‘occupy’ building - they can be shot? WOW that’s great if it’s the same... IF IF IF...
If the standard is the same for both sides it’s a win.
We would have lost one person in the last 3 years - the commie thugs would have lost a few thousand. It would really be OK to shoot them? Bloodbath time -right? Or do YOU have a bunch of reasons why assassinating a protester ONLY matters when the protester is a conservative?
That’s my guess.
My take is it’s wrong to ‘occupy’ a government building - FOR BOTH SIDES.
I support protest but not violent breaking into buildings ‘protest’... we agree on that. And hopefully next time Antifa and BLM riot we can have cops shoot them at point blank range - you agree, right?
If they break into a government building, I surely do agree. If BLM/Antfa start shooting in the streets, they should put down. Should they destroy property or attack other people, they should be arrested and tried.
Nothing would please me more that having BLM/Antifa thugs dealt with quickly and harshly.
By ignoring the BLM/Antifa thug, the various government entities are pushing us to a shooting civil war. That won't be good. It might one day become necessary, but it wouldn't be good.
The libtards need to get an education on statesmanship. They also represent those in their district who didn't vote for them.
As I ponder your question, my anger tends to make me think of the good old GE M134. I’d gladly carry that baby to the next BLM/Antifa meetup.