[catnipman]

i just read the FDA the article putatively referenced, and NOTHING in the article is substantiated by the CDC document ... in fact, nearly everything in the article is simply fabricated:

https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/media.pdf

[ransomnote]

I’ve excerpted and posted from FDA documents before, CDC documents before - all say no isolated samples were available when PCR was produced.

[ransomnote]

i just read the FDA the article putatively referenced, and NOTHING in the article is substantiated by the CDC document ... in fact, nearly everything in the article is simply fabricated:

https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/media.pdf

44 posted on 8/22/2021, 3:51:11 PM by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Do you typically struggle with reading comprehenision? If not, then your entire response is fabricated to mislead FReepers, AGAIN.

Page 4 of the linked document, which is the first page with text rather than Table of Contents information, states that the pooled "up to four" nasal swab samples for persons 'suspected of Covid-19. This is trash - it is not isolated viral samples, they have no idea what was in them. They don't know if any of the 'up to four' (they don't even know how many?!) people with seasonal respiractory infections had anything 'new'. We can assume 'influenza' and common cold were present. 

You fabricated your accusation that the document doesn't support the article. WHy?

Article Excerpt:

"  "

i just read the FDA the article putatively referenced, and NOTHING in the article is substantiated by the CDC document ... in fact, nearly everything in the article is simply fabricated:

https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/media.pdf