I agree with you.
I am a scientist at heart so I am willing to be open to alternative hypothesis. In my opinion the HCQ and ivermectin hypotheses have failed testing. The data and meta analyses are murky. There is no clear answer which tends to tell me it is not the so called silver bullet
However the monoclonal antibody infusion data are impressive. I have seen it work wonders even up to about 9 days post symptoms. These results are also vetted in the literature.
Vaccination has been a source of contention as far back as Sabin and Salk. So be it. Any medicinal construct of a disease involved prevention and treatment. For those who don’t want vaccination we should have good treatments snd we finally have one. For those that don’t want to wait to get sick, vaccination is a good choice and should always be that.
I am glad we have some common and middle ground and I appreciate some of your statements of today. Particularly the ones on the other thread.
“In my opinion the HCQ and ivermectin hypotheses have failed testing.”
There must be a vast chasm between testing and successful use of a drug. I choose to go with the successful administration of a drug. India used ivermectin to stop its spread. That is why you never hear anything about India after the initial hysteria of people dying all over the place.
I think those people are waiting for actual vaccines, gassie.
And are anti-poison.
