Jovan Pulitzer Reveals It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/ ^

[jetvol1]

"Jovan Pulitzer surprised us all once again and likely scared the hell out of any election fraudsters in the process. In a video he released Wednesday on Twitter, Jovan explained that identifying markings are in fact on the ballots and are exactly what they were looking for during the audit! He explained it wasn’t bamboo paper as audit detractors claimed, and it wasn’t secret “watermarks” either.

It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters. "

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

He has been around for a while and he will stay for what ever reason, Jim has no interest in toning him down. Better to let barking dogs bark at another car.

Jim has long made his feelings known on the subject of hit-and-run bloggers.

They post excerpts from their drivel with a click-bait title for the sole purpose of mining unsuspecting FReepers for clicks and impressions ad revenue. They are not FReepers.

See: #32

[New Perspective]

Thank you Jane Fonda

[New Perspective]

LOL, pretty funny, that is a good one. He does lead a sad life though.

[itsahoot]

Jim has long made his feelings known on the subject of hit-and-run bloggers.

And I absolutely agree but a running insult fest benefits no one. If the offenders are belligerent then ban them.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

And I absolutely agree but a running insult fest benefits no one. If the offenders are belligerent then ban them.

Then again, it is just some lame-o blogger's attempt to mine FReepers for clicks.

If a lame-o blogger's thread turns into a flame-fest that turns people off and they refuse to return to it and it falls off the front page, then so much the better.

[billyboy15]

“No way, you smeared your Vagisil all over the cups.”

You whine like a twat. No wonder you bring one of your favorite products into the discussion.