Posted on 08/18/2021 4:01:33 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Those who take the Covid-19 “vaccines” are MORE susceptible to the Delta Variant and have a HIGHER risk of severe disease or even death. This information comes from Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the very mRNA technology used to transmit both the Pfizer and Moderna injections.
Malone took to Twitter to post a thread that has shockingly not been taken down yet. Twitter has been censoring posts that speak ill of the “vaccines,” and a high-profile physician and researcher like Dr. Malone seems ripe for censorship. Perhaps they fear the “Streisand Effect” with this particular thread and are simply suppressing it on the back end.
Is there a brief explanation as to why?
“ Is there a brief explanation as to why?”
******************************************
Perhaps Dr Malone is simply making crap up as he goes along for whatever devils are driving him. His claims go against all experience.
Vaccine turns you into a Virus Magnet ?
Yes they do. The statistics don’t support this at all.
So good move skipping jab after,jab - I’m better off than the suckers.
Can’t load Dr. Robert Malone on Twatter. Did they take him out too?
Great, brave scientist.
He’s right about vaccine effectiveness;
“Following 28 days post-2nd shot, significant reduction was seen in NT50s, IgG, and IgM levels. The average half-life of NT50s was ∼68 days and the average time-length for participants’ serums to lose the detectable activity was ∼198 days.”
“Implications of all the available evidence BNT162b2 efficacy is likely to be diminished to under detection limit by 6-7 months post-1st shot on average. Individuals with moderate NT50s may fail to block beta variants. If BNT162b2-elicited immune memory is lost soon, additional vaccine(s) or other protective means would be needed.”
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.27.21261237v1
Jab after jab after jab...
Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman are credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA vaccines. Both have been nominated for the Nobel in chemistry.
https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/vaccine-trenches-katalin-kariko-and-drew-weissman
https://science-teaching.org/en/science/the-mother-of-the-covid-19-vaccine
https://gulfnews.com/special-reports/drew-weissman-father-of-revolutionary-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-sets-next-target-cancer-other-viral-diseases-1.1618256602528
Muchas gracias, I was having trouble getting it loaded from the link at the website.
the current vaccines provide about 50-60% efficacy in protection from infection. They are not fully protective.
So he is still admitting that the vaccines have some effectiveness.
if you are vaccinated and become infected (“breakthrough”), the virus will replicate at the same or higher levels than if you were unvaccinated and then become infected.
The Delta variant has a mutation that allows it to infect cells more easily. It's known the nasal viral load is magnitude of order higher than the orginal alpha variant. But this is true of vaccinated and unvaccinated.
if you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of transmitting virus to someone else is quite high – remember, the Ro measures how likely you are to transmit the virus.
Yes, because of the higher viral loads and the ease with which Delta infects, Delta is more infections for both vaccinated and unvaccinated. The only increased risk I see for the vaccinated to transmit is that they may be out and about more and may not feel the symptoms as much.
if you are vaccinated and then become infected, your risk of developing severe disease or dying is better than if you were not vaccinated and then become infected with Delta.
That seems to be contradictory to what I'm hearing. Delta despite the higher viral loads is killing fewer people, and fewere still among the vaccinated. Plus it ignores his first statement that the vaccines are 50-60% protective.
Needs more explanation and needs to produce data.
They better collect a Nobel before they collect a 20 year sentence at a Nuremberg II trial.
The faux vaccines compromised the vaccinated’s immune system?
Diminished efficacy weighed against Malone’s assertion implies one’s natural immunity was compromised by the vax. Is that the rationale?
You’re prophetic... lol. See my #17
The Government/Pharma generates these statistics, which serve as the only report card on the safety and effectiveness of these Government/Pharma produced vaccines.
Do you trust them?
LOL! Great minds!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.